These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34351203)

  • 1. Perceptions of custody: Similarities and disparities among police, judges, social psychologists, and laypeople.
    Alceste F; Kassin SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Jun; 45(3):197-214. PubMed ID: 34351203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The presumption of guilt in suspect interrogations: Apprehension as a trigger of confirmation bias and debiasing techniques.
    Lidén M; Gräns M; Juslin P
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):336-354. PubMed ID: 29963877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective interpretation of "objective" video evidence: Perceptions of male versus female police officers' use-of-force.
    Salerno JM; Sanchez J
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 32162949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.
    Kassin SM; Gudjonsson GH
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2004 Nov; 5(2):33-67. PubMed ID: 26158993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications.
    Watamura E; Ioku T
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277939. PubMed ID: 36409707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility.
    Meyer JR; Reppucci ND
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):757-80. PubMed ID: 18046744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view.
    Alison L; Almond L; Christiansen P; Waring S; Power N; Villejoubert G
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(6):729-48. PubMed ID: 23042647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Involuntary hospitalization: A survey of liberty and custody judges].
    Horn M; Frasca J; Amad A; Vaiva G; Thomas P; Fovet T
    Encephale; 2019 Dec; 45(6):522-524. PubMed ID: 29983178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying vulnerability in police custody: Making sense of information provided to custody officers.
    Farrugia L
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 May; 80():102169. PubMed ID: 33901738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Police reports of mock suspect interrogations: A test of accuracy and perception.
    Kassin SM; Kukucka J; Lawson VZ; DeCarlo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Jun; 41(3):230-243. PubMed ID: 27936825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lay evaluations of police and civilian use of force: Action severity scales.
    Celestin BD; Kruschke JK
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Jun; 43(3):290-305. PubMed ID: 31120277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of race on suspect injuries during encounters with police.
    Maguire E
    Inj Prev; 2021 Oct; 27(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 33303558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Young S; Goodwin EJ; Sedgwick O; Gudjonsson GH
    BMC Med; 2013 Nov; 11():248. PubMed ID: 24261542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making Judgments: How Blame Mediates the Influence of Rape Myth Acceptance in Police Response to Sexual Assault.
    Venema RM
    J Interpers Violence; 2019 Jul; 34(13):2697-2722. PubMed ID: 27495113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence strength (insufficiently) affects police officers' decisions to place a suspect in a lineup.
    Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 34968099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Judges Want to Know From Forensic Evaluators in Child Custody and Child Protection Cases: Analyzing Forensic Assignments With Latent Dirichlet Allocation.
    Zumbach J; Volbert R
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():603597. PubMed ID: 33927663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking the next step in Miranda evaluations: Considering racial trauma and the impact of prior police contact.
    Kavanaugh A; Pietruszka V; Rynczak D; Blanding D
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):249-259. PubMed ID: 36931861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Custody early warning scores; Do they predict patient deterioration in police custody?
    Miles T; Webb V; Kevern P; Shibchurn R; Bird T; Finch G
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Nov; 76():102069. PubMed ID: 33099124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The mechanisms of minimization: How interrogation tactics suggest lenient sentencing through pragmatic implication.
    Luke TJ; Alceste F
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Aug; 44(4):266-285. PubMed ID: 32584064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Custody-related deaths in Maharashtra state of India - Analysis of autopsies performed at a medical Teaching Institute during the period 2000-2018.
    Kuchewar SV; Bhosle SH; Shrigiriwar MB; Padole TO
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2020 Feb; 70():101915. PubMed ID: 32090970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.