268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34351312)
1. Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.
Quevedo González FJ; Meyers KN; Schraut N; Mehrotra KG; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Ast MP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2534-2546. PubMed ID: 34351312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of porous custom-made cones for meta-diaphyseal bone defects reconstruction in knee revision surgery: a clinical and biomechanical analysis.
Burastero G; Pianigiani S; Zanvettor C; Cavagnaro L; Chiarlone F; Innocenti B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2020 Dec; 140(12):2041-2055. PubMed ID: 33170352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility.
Nadorf J; Kinkel S; Gantz S; Jakubowitz E; Kretzer JP
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177285. PubMed ID: 28481956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study.
Wang X; Li X; Wang C; Geng X; Chen B; Dong Z; Li Y; Zhao M; Li Z; Li F; Wang C; Tian H
Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2937-2946. PubMed ID: 37712186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Micromotion Analysis of Various Tibial Constructs in Moderate Tibial Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Alipit V; Kirk A; Scholl D; Schmidig G; Springer BD; Lee GC
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Jan; 36(1):362-367.e1. PubMed ID: 32798182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Bedard NA; Cates RA; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. PubMed ID: 32475283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixation techniques and stem dimensions in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a finite element study.
El-Zayat BF; Heyse TJ; Fanciullacci N; Labey L; Fuchs-Winkelmann S; Innocenti B
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Dec; 136(12):1741-1752. PubMed ID: 27704204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: The role of stems.
Xie S; Conlisk N; Hamilton D; Scott C; Burnett R; Pankaj P
Bone Joint Res; 2020 Apr; 9(4):162-172. PubMed ID: 32431807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A finite element analysis of tibial tritanium cones without stems in varying bone defects.
Xie S; Conlisk N; Hamilton D; Scott C; Burnett R; Pankaj P
Knee; 2020 Jun; 27(3):656-666. PubMed ID: 32563420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pain associated with cemented and uncemented long-stemmed tibial components in revision total knee arthroplasty.
Larson DJ; Rosenberg JH; Lawlor MA; Garvin KL; Hartman CW; Lyden E; Konigsberg BS
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):165-170. PubMed ID: 34053295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Biomechanical In Vitro Study of Different Modular Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Stems With Bone Defects.
Guttowski D; Polster V; Huber G; Morlock MM; Püschel K; Nüchtern J
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Nov; 35(11):3318-3325. PubMed ID: 32654944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extraction of total knee arthroplasty intramedullary stem extensions.
Pasquier GJM; Huten D; Common H; Migaud H; Putman S
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 106(1S):S135-S147. PubMed ID: 31812635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of varying stem and metaphyseal sleeve size on the primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIA defects. A simulation study.
Awadalla M; Al-Dirini RMA; O'Rourke D; Solomon LB; Heldreth M; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 29327379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?
Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision to TKA: Are Tibial Stems and Augments Associated With Improved Survivorship?
Lewis PL; Davidson DC; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Donnelly W; Cuthbert A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):854-862. PubMed ID: 29481343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trabecular Metal Cones Combined With Short Cemented Stem Allow Favorable Outcomes in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Jacquet C; Ros F; Guy S; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Feb; 36(2):657-663. PubMed ID: 32978026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How metal augments, polyethylene thickness and stem length affect tibial baseplate load transfer in revision total knee arthroplasty.
LaMonica J; Pham N; Milligan K; Tommasini SM; Schwarzkopf R; Parisi R; Wiznia DH
Knee; 2023 Jan; 40():283-291. PubMed ID: 36529046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface pretreatment for prolonged survival of cemented tibial prosthesis components: full- vs. surface-cementation technique.
Marx R; Qunaibi M; Wirtz DC; Niethard FU; Mumme T
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Oct; 4():61. PubMed ID: 16262888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
