These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34352200)

  • 1. Addressing inequality in fertility treatment.
    Ekechi C
    Lancet; 2021 Aug; 398(10301):645-646. PubMed ID: 34352200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes.
    Quinn M; Fujimoto V
    Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1119-1123. PubMed ID: 27054308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethnic differences in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes.
    Spitzer T; Fujimoto VY
    Semin Reprod Med; 2013 Sep; 31(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 23934696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States.
    Missmer SA; Seifer DB; Jain T
    Fertil Steril; 2011 May; 95(6):1943-9. PubMed ID: 21420677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NICE calls for end to "postcode lottery" of fertility treatment.
    Wise J
    BMJ; 2014 Oct; 349():g6383. PubMed ID: 25341540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org
    Fertil Steril; 2021 Jul; 116(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 34148590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proceedings from the conference on Reproductive Problems in Women of Color.
    Fujimoto VY; Jain T; Alvero R; Nelson LM; Catherino WH; Olatinwo M; Marsh EE; Broomfield D; Taylor H; Armstrong AY
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jun; 94(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 20171628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion.
    Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1104-10. PubMed ID: 26364838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Somos muchos (we are so many): population politics and "reproductive othering" in Mexican fertility clinics.
    Braff L
    Med Anthropol Q; 2013 Mar; 27(1):121-38. PubMed ID: 23674326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disparities in obstetrical outcomes in ART pregnancies compared with natural conceptions.
    Plowden TC; Novak CM; Spong CY
    Semin Reprod Med; 2013 Sep; 31(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 23934694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACCESS OF SINGLE WOMEN TO FERTILITY TREATMENT: A CASE OF INCIDENTAL DISCRIMINATION?
    Krajewska A
    Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):620-45. PubMed ID: 26240286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should patients diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) participate in compensated egg sharing in return for subsidized fertility treatment?
    Heng BC
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2009; 15(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 19580099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overweight and obesity in infertility: cost and consequences.
    Maheshwari A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 20056673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.
    Murugappan G; Li S; Lathi RB; Baker VL; Luke B; Eisenberg ML
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 223(3):404.e1-404.e20. PubMed ID: 32112734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ART for the masses? Racial and ethnic inequality in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Elster NR
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 9(1):719-33. PubMed ID: 17061384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment for couples with unexplained infertility: the female partner at the end of reproductive years.
    Goldman MB; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):e42. PubMed ID: 24794313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of evidence for interventions offered in UK fertility centres.
    Heneghan C; Spencer EA; Bobrovitz N; Collins DR; Nunan D; Plüddemann A; Gbinigie OA; Onakpoya I; O'Sullivan J; Rollinson A; Tompson A; Goldacre B; Mahtani KR
    BMJ; 2016 Nov; 355():i6295. PubMed ID: 27890864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
    Inhorn MC; Patrizio P
    Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(4):411-26. PubMed ID: 25801630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing.
    Milman LW; Senapati S; Sammel MD; Cameron KD; Gracia C
    Fertil Steril; 2017 May; 107(5):1214-1222.e3. PubMed ID: 28476182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fertility preservation for social indications: a cost-based decision analysis.
    Hirshfeld-Cytron J; Grobman WA; Milad MP
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Mar; 97(3):665-70. PubMed ID: 22265038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.