These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34352481)

  • 1. Inexact left-hand side two-stage chance-constrained programming for booster optimization in water distribution system.
    Wang Y; Zhu G
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113372. PubMed ID: 34352481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inexact [Formula: see text] fuzzy chance-constrained programming of booster chlorination for water distribution system under uncertainty.
    Wang Y
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Apr; 193(5):300. PubMed ID: 33895884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards sustainable water resources planning and pollution control: Inexact joint-probabilistic double-sided stochastic chance-constrained programming model.
    Zhang C; Guo S; Zhang F; Engel BA; Guo P
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():73-86. PubMed ID: 30530221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated EPANET-MSX process models of chlorine and its by-products in drinking water distribution systems.
    Fisher IH
    Water Environ Res; 2023 Dec; 95(12):e10949. PubMed ID: 38056599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation-based interval chance-constrained quadratic programming model for water quality management: A case study of the central Grand River in Ontario, Canada.
    Zhang Q; Li Z; Huang W
    Environ Res; 2021 Jan; 192():110206. PubMed ID: 32956658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inexact fuzzy-flexible left-hand-side chance-constrained programming for agricultural nonpoint-source water quality management.
    Ji Y; Sun W; Liu Y; Liu Q; Su J; Huang G; Zhao J
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 854():158565. PubMed ID: 36075412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible decision-making framework for developing operation protocol for water distribution systems.
    Abhijith GR; Ostfeld A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115817. PubMed ID: 36056480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation-based bi-level multi-objective programming model for watershed water quality management under interval and stochastic uncertainties.
    Rong Q; Cai Y; Su M; Yue W; Yang Z; Dang Z
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 245():418-431. PubMed ID: 31163379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk-based framework for optimizing residual chlorine in large water distribution systems.
    Sharif MN; Farahat A; Haider H; Al-Zahrani MA; Rodriguez MJ; Sadiq R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):307. PubMed ID: 28573352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Data-driven interval credibility constrained quadratic programming model for water quality management under uncertainty.
    Zhang Q; Li Z
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 293():112791. PubMed ID: 34089957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan.
    Zhang C; Yue Q; Guo P
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 May; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 31142013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Inexact Optimization Model for Crop Area Under Multiple Uncertainties.
    Ren C; Zhang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 31336673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained water management model.
    Xu J; Huang G; Li Z; Chen J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 May; 24(13):12437-12454. PubMed ID: 28361398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Calibration of water quality model for distribution networks using genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and hybrid methods.
    Peirovi Minaee R; Afsharnia M; Moghaddam A; Ebrahimi AA; Askarishahi M; Mokhtari M
    MethodsX; 2019; 6():540-548. PubMed ID: 30976527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of disinfectant dosage for simultaneous control of lead and disinfection-byproducts in water distribution networks.
    Maheshwari A; Abokifa A; Gudi RD; Biswas P
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Dec; 276():111186. PubMed ID: 32906070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty analysis in a mechanistic model of bacterial regrowth in distribution systems.
    Digiano FA; Zhang W
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Nov; 38(22):5925-31. PubMed ID: 15573590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Development and application of a multi-species water quality model for water distribution systems with EPANET-MSX].
    Sun F; Chen JN; Zeng SY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Dec; 29(12):3360-7. PubMed ID: 19256368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An inexact mixed risk-aversion two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty.
    Li W; Wang B; Xie YL; Huang GH; Liu L
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Feb; 22(4):2964-75. PubMed ID: 25226833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal design and operation of booster chlorination stations layout in water distribution systems.
    Ohar Z; Ostfeld A
    Water Res; 2014 Jul; 58():209-20. PubMed ID: 24762553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New model of chlorine-wall reaction for simulating chlorine concentration in drinking water distribution systems.
    Fisher I; Kastl G; Sathasivan A
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 125():427-437. PubMed ID: 28892770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.