These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34352830)

  • 1. Total Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Compared With Supracervical Hysterectomy With Sacrocervicopexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
    Giugale LE; Melnyk AI; Ruppert KM; Napoe GS; Lavelle ES; Bradley MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 138(3):435-442. PubMed ID: 34352830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recurrence of vaginal prolapse after total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: comparison between normal-weight and overweight women.
    Rappa C; Saccone G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):601.e1-601.e4. PubMed ID: 27342042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse.
    Jan H; Ghai V; Doumouchtsis SK
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):952-953. PubMed ID: 29274382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of uterosacral ligaments suspension for uterovaginal prolapse native-tissue repair: Over 1000-patient single-center study.
    Barba M; Cola A; Costa C; De Vicari D; Amatucci N; Melocchi T; Frigerio M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Oct; 301():206-209. PubMed ID: 39154516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
    Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse.
    Unger CA; Walters MD; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Paraiso MF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):603.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25434838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse.
    Diwan A; Rardin CR; Strohsnitter WC; Weld A; Rosenblatt P; Kohli N
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Jan; 17(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 15997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reoperation for prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous mesh hysteropexy: characteristics of women choosing retreatment.
    Napoe GS; Luchristt D; Sridhar A; Ellington D; Ridgeway B; Mazloomdoost D; Sung V; Ninivaggio C; Harvie H; Santiago-Lastra Y; Gantz MG; Zyczynski HM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):255-261. PubMed ID: 36449027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
    Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Defining mechanisms of recurrence following apical prolapse repair based on imaging criteria.
    Bowen ST; Moalli PA; Abramowitch SD; Lockhart ME; Weidner AC; Ferrando CA; Nager CW; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):506.e1-506.e28. PubMed ID: 34087229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal prolapse recurrence after uterosacral ligament suspension in normal-weight compared with overweight and obese women.
    Edenfield AL; Amundsen CL; Weidner AC; Wu JM; George A; Siddiqui NY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 121(3):554-559. PubMed ID: 23635618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.