These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34352830)

  • 21. Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Bradley MS; Sridhar A; Ferrante K; Andy UU; Visco AG; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Myers D; Varner E; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG;
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):479-488. PubMed ID: 36701331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Mao M; Fu H; Wang Q; Bai J; Zhang Y; Guo R
    Maturitas; 2023 Apr; 170():58-63. PubMed ID: 36773501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effectiveness of vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse].
    Shen WJ; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Duan L; Zhang YH; Niu K; Wang WY; Qin L; Zhang XL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 54(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 31006188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
    Bradley MS; Bickhaus JA; Amundsen CL; Newcomb LK; Truong T; Weidner AC; Siddiqui NY
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.
    Rardin CR; Erekson EA; Sung VW; Ward RM; Myers DL
    J Reprod Med; 2009 May; 54(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 19517690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absorbable versus Permanent Suture for Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse.
    Chill HH; Cohen-Milun G; Cohen A; Moss NP; Winer JD; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):784-790. PubMed ID: 35283321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension technique for post hysterectomy apical prolapse in 472 women: results from a longitudinal clinical study.
    Karmakar D; Dwyer PL; Thomas E; Schierlitz L
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):536-542. PubMed ID: 30461171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy: initial experience with a novel surgical approach to uterovaginal prolapse.
    Rosenblatt PL; Apostolis CA; Hacker MR; DiSciullo A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(6):749-55. PubMed ID: 23084680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
    Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
    Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-Term Costs of Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy Compared to Native Tissue Vaginal Repair With Concomitant Hysterectomy.
    El Haraki AS; Shepherd JP; Matthews CA; Cadish LA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 31(8):674-679. PubMed ID: 38705377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of uterine preservation on outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension.
    Bedford ND; Seman EI; O'Shea RT; Keirse MJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 23321154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sacrospinous Fixation and Vaginal Uterosacral Suspension-Evaluation in Uterine Preservation Surgery.
    Woodburn KL; Yuan AS; Torosis M; Roberts K; Ferrando CA; Gutman RE
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):469-478. PubMed ID: 36516026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Hwang WY; Jeon MJ; Suh DH
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 May; 31(5):406-413. PubMed ID: 38336010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Woodburn KL; Bradley SE; Ward SA; Schirm KA; Clarke B; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 36223863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Back to the future: vaginal hysterectomy and Campbell uterosacral ligaments suspension for urogenital prolapse.
    Pettenati C; Cour F; Bosset PO; Kennel T; Vidart A; Lebret T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 33620535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Extraperitoneal high vaginal cuff suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: Results of a modified McCall technique from a longitudinal clinical study.
    Zilberlicht A; Dwyer PL; Karmakar D; Carswell F; Schierlitz L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 61(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33346932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.