These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34354623)

  • 1. Measuring Collaboration Load With Pupillary Responses - Implications for the Design of Instructions in Task-Oriented HRI.
    Kontogiorgos D; Gustafson J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():623657. PubMed ID: 34354623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audience Design in Multiparty Conversation.
    Yoon SO; Brown-Schmidt S
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Aug; 43(8):e12774. PubMed ID: 31446659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective eye-gaze behaviour during face-to-face communication with proficient alaryngeal speakers: a preliminary study.
    Evitts P; Gallop R
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(5):535-49. PubMed ID: 21899671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Content-specific coordination of listeners' to speakers' EEG during communication.
    Kuhlen AK; Allefeld C; Haynes JD
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():266. PubMed ID: 23060770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues to Lying May be Deceptive: Speaker and Listener Behaviour in an Interactive Game of Deception.
    Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
    J Cogn; 2018 Sep; 1(1):42. PubMed ID: 31517215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When do speakers take into account common ground?
    Horton WS; Keysar B
    Cognition; 1996 Apr; 59(1):91-117. PubMed ID: 8857472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.
    Schafer AJ; Speer SR; Warren P; White SD
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2000 Mar; 29(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 10709182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The social basis of referential communication: Speakers construct physical reference based on listeners' expected visual search.
    Jara-Ettinger J; Rubio-Fernandez P
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Nov; 129(6):1394-1413. PubMed ID: 34968132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of speakers' gaze on situated language comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.
    Jachmann TK; Drenhaus H; Staudte M; Crocker MW
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103571. PubMed ID: 31202157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informationally redundant utterances elicit pragmatic inferences.
    Kravtchenko E; Demberg V
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105159. PubMed ID: 35580451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive Modeling of Individual Variation in Reference Production and Comprehension.
    Hendriks P
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():506. PubMed ID: 27092101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
    Haywood SL; Pickering MJ; Branigan HP
    Psychol Sci; 2005 May; 16(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 15869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Markers of topical discourse in child-directed speech.
    Rohde H; Frank MC
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(8):1634-61. PubMed ID: 24731080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of speaker gaze on listener comprehension: contrasting visual versus intentional accounts.
    Staudte M; Crocker MW; Heloir A; Kipp M
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):317-28. PubMed ID: 25079951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listeners' comprehension of uptalk in spontaneous speech.
    Tomlinson JM; Fox Tree JE
    Cognition; 2011 Apr; 119(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21237451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planning and coordination of utterances in a joint naming task.
    Hoedemaker RS; Meyer AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):732-752. PubMed ID: 29999401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When a look is enough: Neurophysiological correlates of referential speaker gaze in situated comprehension.
    Jachmann TK; Drenhaus H; Staudte M; Crocker MW
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105449. PubMed ID: 37030139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploiting Listener Gaze to Improve Situated Communication in Dynamic Virtual Environments.
    Garoufi K; Staudte M; Koller A; Crocker MW
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 40(7):1671-1703. PubMed ID: 26471391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Timing of Utterance Planning in Task-Oriented Dialogue: Evidence from a Novel List-Completion Paradigm.
    Barthel M; Sauppe S; Levinson SC; Meyer AS
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1858. PubMed ID: 27990127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.