These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34355994)

  • 21. Response Mixture Modeling: Accounting for Heterogeneity in Item Characteristics across Response Times.
    Molenaar D; de Boeck P
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):279-297. PubMed ID: 29392567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A semi-parametric within-subject mixture approach to the analyses of responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Bolsinova M; Vermunt JK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):205-228. PubMed ID: 29044460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Shrinkage estimation of the three-parameter logistic model.
    Battauz M; Bellio R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Nov; 74(3):591-609. PubMed ID: 33734439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2540. PubMed ID: 30618961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semisupervised Learning Method to Adjust Biased Item Difficulty Estimates Caused by Nonignorable Missingness in a Virtual Learning Environment.
    Xue K; Huggins-Manley AC; Leite W
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 82(3):539-567. PubMed ID: 35444339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Mixture Cure-Rate Model for Responses and Response Times in Time-Limit Tests.
    Lee YH; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):748-75. PubMed ID: 25280442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Latent Transition Analysis Model for Latent-State-Dependent Nonignorable Missingness.
    Sterba SK
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):506-34. PubMed ID: 25697371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison of Robust Likelihood Estimators to Mitigate Bias From Rapid Guessing.
    Rios JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):236-249. PubMed ID: 35528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Bayesian Latent Variable Selection Model for Nonignorable Missingness.
    Du H; Enders C; Keller BT; Bradbury TN; Karney BR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2022; 57(2-3):478-512. PubMed ID: 33529056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining proration and full information maximum likelihood in handling missing data in Likert scale items: A hybrid approach.
    Wu W; Gu F; Fukui S
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):922-940. PubMed ID: 34357540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayesian Two-Part Tobit Models with Left-Censoring, Skewness, and Nonignorable Missingness.
    Dagne GA; Huang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(4):714-30. PubMed ID: 24905924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Item selection via Bayesian IRT models.
    Arima S
    Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 25327293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling Test-Taking Non-effort in MIRT Models.
    Liu Y; Li Z; Liu H; Luo F
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():145. PubMed ID: 30778317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the Speed Sensitivity Parameter in the Lognormal Model for Response Times and Implications for High-Stakes Measurement Practice.
    Becker B; Debeer D; Weirich S; Goldhammer F
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Sep; 45(6):407-422. PubMed ID: 34565944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Compromised item detection: A Bayesian change-point perspective.
    Du Y; Zhang S; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):131-153. PubMed ID: 36069306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Interaction of Ability Differences and Guessing When Modeling Differential Item Functioning With the Rasch Model: Conventional and Tailored Calibration.
    DeMars CE; Jurich DP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Aug; 75(4):610-633. PubMed ID: 29795835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.