195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34357491)
1. Pandemic hospital site selection: a GIS-based MCDM approach employing Pythagorean fuzzy sets.
Boyacı AÇ; Şişman A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(2):1985-1997. PubMed ID: 34357491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
Onüt S; Soner S
Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of landfill sites using GIS-based MCDA with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.
Özkan B; Sarıçiçek İ; Özceylan E
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Dec; 27(34):42908-42932. PubMed ID: 32725564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sanitary landfill site selection by integrating AHP and FTOPSIS with GIS: a case study of Memari Municipality, India.
Ali SA; Parvin F; Al-Ansari N; Pham QB; Ahmad A; Raj MS; Anh DT; Ba LH; Thai VN
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(6):7528-7550. PubMed ID: 33034852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Site selection for waste vegetable oil and waste battery collection boxes: a GIS-based hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach.
Çalış Boyacı A; Şişman A; Sarıcaoğlu K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17431-17444. PubMed ID: 33398726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making method for the selection of potential municipal solid waste disposal sites in Mersin, Turkey.
Bilgilioglu SS; Gezgin C; Orhan O; Karakus P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(4):5313-5329. PubMed ID: 34417701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implementation of fuzzy, Simos and strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis for municipal solid waste landfill site selection: Adana City case study.
Unal M; Cilek A; Guner ED
Waste Manag Res; 2020 May; 38(1_suppl):45-64. PubMed ID: 31845834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of GIS-based AHP and fuzzy AHP methods for hospital site selection: a case study for Prayagraj City, India.
Tripathi AK; Agrawal S; Gupta RD
GeoJournal; 2022; 87(5):3507-3528. PubMed ID: 34075269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solid waste disposal site selection with GIS and AHP methodology: a case study in Senirkent-Uluborlu (Isparta) Basin, Turkey.
Sener S; Sener E; Karagüzel R
Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Feb; 173(1-4):533-54. PubMed ID: 20213053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landfill siting for municipal solid waste using remote sensing and geographic information system integrated analytic hierarchy process and simple additive weighting methods from the point of view of a fast-growing metropolitan area in GAP area of Turkey.
Karabulut Aİ; Yazici-Karabulut B; Derin P; Yesilnacar MI; Cullu MA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(3):4044-4061. PubMed ID: 34396479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landfill site selection via integrating multi-criteria decision techniques with geographic information systems: a case study in Naqadeh, Iran.
Khorsandi H; Faramarzi A; Aghapour AA; Jafari SJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Nov; 191(12):730. PubMed ID: 31705330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection of MSW landfill site by fuzzy-AHP approach combined with GIS: case study in Ahvaz, Iran.
Chabok M; Asakereh A; Bahrami H; Jaafarzadeh NO
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jun; 192(7):433. PubMed ID: 32542483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Odor-aided analysis for landfill site selection: study of DOKAP Region, Turkey.
Yildirim V; Uzun B; Memisoglu Baykal T; Terzi F; Atasoy BA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(7):10754-10770. PubMed ID: 34532791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A fair bed allocation during COVID-19 pandemic using TOPSIS technique based on correlation coefficient for interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy hypersoft set.
Zulqarnain RM; Ma WX; Siddique I; Ahmad H; Askar S
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):7678. PubMed ID: 38561356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.
Sotoudeh-Anvari A
Appl Soft Comput; 2022 Sep; 126():109238. PubMed ID: 35795407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Geospatial modelling of COVID-19 vulnerability using an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study of West Bengal, India.
Malakar S
Model Earth Syst Environ; 2022; 8(3):3103-3116. PubMed ID: 34604502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Evaluating Digital Technology Strategies in COVID-19 Pandemic Under Uncertainty.
Salimian S; Mousavi SM
Arab J Sci Eng; 2023; 48(5):7005-7017. PubMed ID: 36090763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of product conceptual design based on Pythagorean fuzzy set under big data environment.
Ma LD; Wang WX; Xie JW; Zhang N; Hu NF; Wang ZA
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22387. PubMed ID: 36575300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
Chen CH
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
