143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34357806)
1. Upright Tomosynthesis-guided Breast Biopsy: Tips, Tricks, and Troubleshooting.
Vijapura CA; Wahab RA; Thakore AG; Mahoney MC
Radiographics; 2021; 41(5):1265-1282. PubMed ID: 34357806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of prone and upright, stereotactic, and tomosynthesis-guided biopsies with secondary analysis of ultrasound-occult architectural distortions.
Cohen EO; Korhonen KE; Sun J; Leung JWT
Eur Radiol; 2023 Sep; 33(9):6189-6203. PubMed ID: 37042980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prone Versus Upright Digital Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy.
Choudhery S; Johnson M; Fazzio RT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):760-764. PubMed ID: 32755154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
Schrading S; Distelmaier M; Dirrichs T; Detering S; Brolund L; Strobel K; Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 25386875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.
Horvat JV; Keating DM; Rodrigues-Duarte H; Morris EA; Mango VL
Radiographics; 2019; 39(2):307-318. PubMed ID: 30681901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of radiation dose between 2D digital stereotactic versus digital breast tomosynthesis-guided breast biopsies.
Amir T; Zuckerman SP; Barufaldi B; Maidment AD; Conant EF
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jan; 134():109407. PubMed ID: 33248401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast tomosynthesis: What do we know and where do we stand?
Mandoul C; Verheyden C; Millet I; Orliac C; Pages E; Thomassin I; Taourel P
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):537-551. PubMed ID: 31427217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-guided biopsy of calcifications: pearls and pitfalls.
Choudhery S; Anderson T; Valencia E
Clin Imaging; 2021 Apr; 72():83-90. PubMed ID: 33217675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions.
Freer PE; Niell B; Rafferty EA
Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 25575115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.
Tucker AW; Calliste J; Gidcumb EM; Wu J; Kuzmiak CM; Hyun N; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 25172412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rate of radial scars by core biopsy and upgrading to malignancy or high-risk lesions before and after introduction of digital breast tomosynthesis.
Phantana-Angkool A; Forster MR; Warren YE; Livasy CA; Sobel AH; Beasley LM; Trufan SJ; Hadzikadic-Gusic L; Sarantou T; Voci AE; Sarma D; White RL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 30242581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate Migration of Biopsy Clip Markers After Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Core Biopsy.
Teichgraeber DC; Martaindale S; Omofoye TS; Hess KR; Parikh JR; Whitman GJ
Acad Radiol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 31076332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
