259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34358405)
1. Pathological features of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 MRI lesions in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rahota RG; Diamand R; Malavaud B; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Peltier A; Beauval JB; Roumeguère T; Roumiguié M; Albisinni S; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 34358405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of systematic, MRI-targeted biopsies alone or in combination for the prediction of unfavourable disease in MRI-positive low-risk prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; Beauval JB; Lesourd M; Almeras C; Assoun J; Aziza R; Gautier JR; Loison G; Portalez D; Salin A; Tollon C; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Roumiguié M
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):663-671. PubMed ID: 31197523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy of biopsy naïve men diagnosed with MRI targeted biopsy alone without concomitant standard systematic sampling.
Luzzago S; Petralia G; Maresca D; Sabatini I; Cordima G; Brescia A; Verweij F; Garelli G; Mistretta FA; Cioffi A; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):929.e11-929.e19. PubMed ID: 32600928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of perilesional and multiparametric resonance imaging-targeted biopsies to reduce the risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy pathology: A retrospective monocentric study.
Diamand R; Hollans M; Lefebvre Y; Sirtaine N; Limani K; Hawaux E; Abou Zahr R; Mattlet A; Albisinni S; Roumeguère T; Peltier A
Urol Oncol; 2022 May; 40(5):192.e11-192.e17. PubMed ID: 35236622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicentric study on accurate grading of prostate cancer with systematic and MRI/US fusion targeted biopsies: comparison with final histopathology after radical prostatectomy.
Diamand R; Oderda M; Al Hajj Obeid W; Albisinni S; Van Velthoven R; Fasolis G; Simone G; Ferriero M; Roche JB; Piechaud T; Pastore A; Carbone A; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Marra G; Gontero P; Altobelli E; Papalia R; Kumar P; Eldred-Evans D; Giacobbe A; Muto G; Lacetera V; Beatrici V; Roumeguere T; Peltier A
World J Urol; 2019 Oct; 37(10):2109-2117. PubMed ID: 30652213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Visible Tumor (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on Upgrading and Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Low Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Biopsy Core Based Analysis.
Özkan A; Köseoğlu E; Kılıç M; Baydar DE; Sağlıcan Y; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Kordan Y; Kiremit MC; Çil B; Tuğcu V; Bakır B; Esen T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Feb; 20(1):e61-e67. PubMed ID: 34750082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it necessary for all patients with suspicious lesions undergo systematic biopsy in the era of MRI-TRUS fusion targeted biopsy?
Lv Z; Wang J; Wang M; Hou H; Song L; Li H; Wang X; Liu M
Int Braz J Urol; 2023; 49(3):359-371. PubMed ID: 37115180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Compared to Transrectal Systematic Biopsy in the Prediction of Tumour Aggressiveness in Patients with Previously Negative Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton G; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 30149386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suboptimal Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens by mpMRI-Targeted Biopsy.
Karsiyakali N; Ozgen MB; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():217-223. PubMed ID: 32871139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.
Kesch C; Pantea V; Soeterik T; Marquis A; la Bombarda G; Morlacco A; Barletta F; Radtke JP; Darr C; Preisser F; Zattoni F; Marra G; van den Bergh RCN; Hadaschik B; Gandaglia G;
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 36534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI Fusion-Targeted Transrectal Prostate Biopsy and the Role of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density and Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Southeast Asian Men.
Tan TW; Png KS; Lee CH; Yuwono A; Yeow Y; Chong KT; Lee YM; Tan CH; Tan YK
J Endourol; 2017 Nov; 31(11):1111-1116. PubMed ID: 28797178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion identified on magnetic resonance imaging require systematic biopsy in addition to targeted biopsy?
Drobish JN; Bevill MD; Tracy CR; Sexton SM; Rajput M; Metz CM; Gellhaus PT
Urol Oncol; 2021 Apr; 39(4):235.e1-235.e4. PubMed ID: 33451935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison between Grade Group assessed on systematic and MRI/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies correlated to the radical prostatectomy specimens in patients with prostate cancer.
Payrard-Starck C; Fourcade A; An Nguyen T; Tissot V; Doucet L; Marolleau J; Lucas C; Fournier G; Valeri A
Prog Urol; 2023 Apr; 33(5):265-271. PubMed ID: 36740508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
