BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3435850)

  • 1. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography.
    Haagen FD; Lok D; Pasteuning H
    Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Stiris MG; Laerum F
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of low osmolar contrast agents during coronary angiography in the dog and the rabbit.
    Doucet D; Idée JM; Donadieu AM; Bonnemain B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2742326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
    Vik-Mo H; Følling M; Barth P; Nordrehaug JE; Bjørkhaug A; Rosland GA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sodium addition to nonionic contrast media. Effects on cardiac monophasic action potentials and hemodynamics in a dog model.
    Jacobsen EA; Kløw NE; Mortensen E; Refsum H
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Oct; 26(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 1960031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Contrast media in peripheral angiography: does cost reduction mean loss of quality and safety? A reevaluation based on a randomized double-blind comparative study of ioxaglate versus iopromide].
    Lammer J; Winkelbauer F; Thurnher S; Wildling R; Farres MT; Woessmer B
    Rofo; 1996 May; 164(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 8634406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Significance of low osmolarity contrast media in state of the art roentgen diagnosis].
    Pokorny L; Kiss I; Karcsú S; Nehéz I; Feledi J; Vadon G
    Orv Hetil; 1989 Jun; 130(25):1317-21. PubMed ID: 2664636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open label study of ioxaglate in coronary angiography. Multicentre clinical trial.
    Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():21A-22A. PubMed ID: 3325156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the temperature of contrast media on cardiac electrophysiology and hemodynamics during coronary arteriography.
    Jacobsen EA; Mortensen E; Refsum H; Kløw NE
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Nov; 27(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 1464514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of contrast media on the RR and QT interval during coronary arteriography.
    Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Soga T; Maeda M; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Misaki T; Dokoh S
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2031794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changes in renal function immediately after the angiography].
    Murakami R; Tajima H; Kumazaki T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Jun; 54(7):605-12. PubMed ID: 8065882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
    Soiva M; Hekali P; Keto P; Karumo J; Salonen O; Heikkilä J
    Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent development in non-ionic contrast media.
    Hagen B
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 2742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of contrast media on myocardial function during acute left ventricular failure in the dog.
    Kløw NE; Hevrøy O; Dale K; Mjøs OD
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2298549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during coronary arteriography before and after acute left ventricular failure in dogs. A comparison between iodixanol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
    Kløw NE; Mortensen E; Refsum H
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 2031795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC; Barth P; Chastin I; Erdmann E
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ionized calcium levels in coronary sinus blood during coronary angiography: effects of four contrast media.
    Mitsumori M; Hayakawa K; Torizuka T; Okuno Y; Monji T; Uwatoko H; Kitamura K; Abe M
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):159-61. PubMed ID: 1549664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tolerability of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide in x-ray computed tomography. Comparison with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Fredy D; Heitz F; Mathieu D; Vasile N
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989; 32(4 Pt 2):358-60. PubMed ID: 2688533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.