These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34358750)

  • 1. How do pedestrians respond to adaptive headlamp systems in vehicles? A road-crossing study in an immersive virtual environment.
    Subramanian LD; O'Neal EE; Roman A; Sherony R; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 160():106298. PubMed ID: 34358750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do bicyclists respond to vehicles with adaptive headlamp systems? A nighttime study in an immersive virtual environment.
    Devi Subramanian L; Sherony R; Kearney JK; Plumert JM; O'Neal EE
    J Safety Res; 2024 Feb; 88():24-30. PubMed ID: 38485366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of daytime and nighttime pedestrian road-crossing behavior using an immersive virtual environment.
    Subramanian LD; O'Neal EE; Mallaro S; Williams B; Sherony R; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 35100060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions.
    Song Y; Jiang Q; Chen W; Zhuang X; Ma G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107115. PubMed ID: 37209555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.
    Rahimian P; O'Neal EE; Zhou S; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):833-843. PubMed ID: 29920115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling pedestrian gap crossing index under mixed traffic condition.
    Naser MM; Zulkiple A; Al Bargi WA; Khalifa NA; Daniel BD
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():91-98. PubMed ID: 29203029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do Simulated Augmented Reality Overlays Influence Street-Crossing Decisions for Non-Mobility-Impaired Older and Younger Adult Pedestrians?
    Malik J; Kim NY; Parr MDN; Kearney JK; Plumert JM; Rector K
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1520-1530. PubMed ID: 36657138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics.
    Devi Subramanian L; O'Neal EE; Kim NY; Noonan M; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107567. PubMed ID: 38669901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.
    Dommes A; Merlhiot G; Lobjois R; Dang NT; Vienne F; Boulo J; Oliver AH; Crétual A; Cavallo V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106256. PubMed ID: 34146938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians' hazard perception.
    Meir A; Oron-Gilad T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():111-126. PubMed ID: 32199554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of the increases in pedestrian motor-vehicle crash fatalities during 2009-2016.
    Hu W; Cicchino JB
    J Safety Res; 2018 Dec; 67():37-44. PubMed ID: 30553428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exploratory study of pedestrian crossing speeds at midblock crossing in India using LiDAR.
    Vasudevan V; Tiwari A; Chakroborty P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 35020500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour.
    Tian K; Tzigieras A; Wei C; Lee YM; Holmes C; Leonetti M; Merat N; Romano R; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107173. PubMed ID: 37336051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning to interpret novel eHMI: The effect of vehicle kinematics and eHMI familiarity on pedestrian' crossing behavior.
    Lee YM; Madigan R; Uzondu C; Garcia J; Romano R; Markkula G; Merat N
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():270-280. PubMed ID: 35249607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the pedestrian dilemma zone at uncontrolled midblock sections.
    Pawar DS; Yadav AK
    J Safety Res; 2022 Feb; 80():87-96. PubMed ID: 35249631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use.
    Demiroz YI; Onelcin P; Alver Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():220-8. PubMed ID: 25916663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.
    Métayer N; Coeugnet S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103478. PubMed ID: 34116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of pedestrian critical gap and crossing speed at midblock crossing using image processing.
    Alver Y; Onelcin P; Cicekli A; Abdel-Aty M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106127. PubMed ID: 33865175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating yielding behavior of heterogeneous vehicles at a semi-controlled crosswalk.
    Wang Y; Su Q; Wang C; Prato CG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Oct; 161():106381. PubMed ID: 34479122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cross or wait? Pedestrian decision making during clearance phase at signalized intersections.
    Zhuang X; Wu C; Ma S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():115-124. PubMed ID: 29197691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.