These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34358924)

  • 1. Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry.
    Lim SJ; Carter YD; Njoroge JM; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Brain Lang; 2021 Oct; 221():104996. PubMed ID: 34358924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.
    Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104393. PubMed ID: 32688132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    Jusczyk PW; Pisoni DB; Mullennix J
    Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):253-91. PubMed ID: 1643815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive neurostimulation of left temporal lobe disrupts rapid talker adaptation in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Brain Lang; 2019 Sep; 196():104655. PubMed ID: 31310963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinct mechanisms for talker adaptation operate in parallel on different timescales.
    Choi JY; Kou RSN; Perrachione TK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 34731443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.
    Lee JJ; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):2002-2015. PubMed ID: 35534783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?
    Luthra S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):104-121. PubMed ID: 37580454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EEG activity evoked in preparation for multi-talker listening by adults and children.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():83-100. PubMed ID: 27178442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists.
    Martin CS; Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Summers WV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Jul; 15(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 2526857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EEG correlates of spatial shifts of attention in a dynamic multi-talker speech perception scenario in younger and older adults.
    Getzmann S; Klatt LI; Schneider D; Begau A; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 398():108077. PubMed ID: 32987238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker normalization is mediated by structured indexical information.
    Stilp CE; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 32077069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Tin JAA; Perrachione TK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):209. PubMed ID: 36732274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.
    Cummings SN; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2335-2359. PubMed ID: 36076119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG alpha and pupil diameter reflect endogenous auditory attention switching and listening effort.
    Haro S; Rao HM; Quatieri TF; Smalt CJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 55(5):1262-1277. PubMed ID: 35098604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction of bottom-up and top-down neural mechanisms in spatial multi-talker speech perception.
    Patel P; van der Heijden K; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    Curr Biol; 2022 Sep; 32(18):3971-3986.e4. PubMed ID: 35973430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.