These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34358924)

  • 21. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reading aloud in clear speech reduces sentence recognition memory and recall for native and non-native talkers.
    Keerstock S; Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Nov; 150(5):3387. PubMed ID: 34852619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103982. PubMed ID: 31229740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.
    Perrachione TK; Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1651-65. PubMed ID: 24801962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists.
    Goldinger SD; Pisoni DB; Logan JS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1991 Jan; 17(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 1826729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control.
    Wöstmann M; Lim SJ; Obleser J
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Jun; 27(6):3307-3317. PubMed ID: 28334352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cortical mechanisms of talker normalization in fluent sentences.
    Uddin S; Reis KS; Heald SLM; Van Hedger SC; Nusbaum HC
    Brain Lang; 2020 Feb; 201():104722. PubMed ID: 31835154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of talker discontinuity on cortical dynamics of auditory spatial attention.
    Mehraei G; Shinn-Cunningham B; Dau T
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():548-556. PubMed ID: 29960089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents.
    Song J; Iverson P
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():163-170. PubMed ID: 29957515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Oscillatory delta and theta frequencies differentially support multiple items encoding to optimize memory performance during the digit span task.
    Aktürk T; de Graaf TA; Erdal F; Sack AT; Güntekin B
    Neuroimage; 2022 Nov; 263():119650. PubMed ID: 36167270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effects of Task Difficulty Predictability and Noise Reduction on Recall Performance and Pupil Dilation Responses.
    Micula A; Rönnberg J; Fiedler L; Wendt D; Jørgensen MC; Larsen DK; Ng EHN
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1668-1679. PubMed ID: 33859121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Learning individual talkers' structural preferences.
    Kamide Y
    Cognition; 2012 Jul; 124(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 22498776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.