359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34360051)
1. Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.
Berchialla P; Sciannameo V; Urru S; Lanera C; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Baldi I
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.
van der Laan MJ; Gruber S
Int J Biostat; 2010 May; 6(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 20628637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
Zivich PN; Breskin A
Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency and robustness of causal effect estimators when noncompliance is measured with error.
Boatman JA; Vock DM; Koopmeiners JS
Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4126-4141. PubMed ID: 30109713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments in observational studies with a binary outcome.
Hu L; Gu C; Lopez M; Ji J; Wisnivesky J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3218-3234. PubMed ID: 32450775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonparametric inverse-probability-weighted estimators based on the highly adaptive lasso.
Ertefaie A; Hejazi NS; van der Laan MJ
Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):1029-1041. PubMed ID: 35839293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part I.
van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 2. PubMed ID: 21969992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. G-computation and doubly robust standardisation for continuous-time data: A comparison with inverse probability weighting.
Chatton A; Borgne FL; Leyrat C; Foucher Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 34861799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.
Bahamyirou A; Blais L; Forget A; Schnitzer ME
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1637-1650. PubMed ID: 29717941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longitudinal plasmode algorithms to evaluate statistical methods in realistic scenarios: an illustration applied to occupational epidemiology.
Souli Y; Trudel X; Diop A; Brisson C; Talbot D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Oct; 23(1):242. PubMed ID: 37853309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marginal Structural Models with Counterfactual Effect Modifiers.
Zheng W; Luo Z; van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2018 Jun; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29883322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
