These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34360390)

  • 1. Effect of Exposure Angulation on the Occupational Radiation Exposure during Cardiac Angiography: Simulation Study.
    Roh Y; Kim J; Park H; Kim J; Ryu D; Chun K; Seo J; Lee B; Cho B; Yoon Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation exposure of interventional cardiologists during coronary angiography: evaluation by phantom measurement and computer simulation.
    Roh Y; Nam S; Lee BK; Ryu DR; Chun K; Lee KS; Cho N; Yoon Y; Park H; Cho BR; Kim JS
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 43(4):1279-1287. PubMed ID: 32997298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Empen K; Robinson DM; Reuter G; Wucherer M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 15464322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Personal operator dose in invasive cardiology as a function of body height and tube angulation].
    Kuon E; Empen K; Reuter G; Dahm JB
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):739-45. PubMed ID: 15122474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
    Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the Annual Eye Lens Dose for Cardiologists During Interventional Procedures Using Anthropomorphic Phantoms and mEyeDose_X Tool.
    Saeed MK
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):527-531. PubMed ID: 31883982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with a novel vertical radiation shield.
    Panetta CJ; Galbraith EM; Yanavitski M; Koller PK; Shah B; Iqbal S; Cigarroa JE; Gordon G; Rao SV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 31793752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Occupational radiation exposure to the head is higher for scrub nurses than cardiologists during cardiac angiography.
    Wilson-Stewart K; Hartel G; Fontanarosa D
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Nov; 75(11):2692-2700. PubMed ID: 31144368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Evaluation of the Organ Dose Received by Cardiologists Arising From Angiography Examinations in Educational Hospital in Rasht.
    Shoshtary A; Pirayesh Islamian J; Asadinezhad M; Sadremomtaz A
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Nov; 8(7):185-94. PubMed ID: 26925906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Robinson DM; Empen K; Günther M; Wucherer W
    Z Kardiol; 2005 Oct; 94(10):663-73. PubMed ID: 16200481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
    Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Beam projections and radiation exposure in transradial and transfemoral approaches during coronary angiography.
    Tarighatnia A; Mohammadalian A; Ghojazade M; Pourafkari L; Farajollahi A
    Anatol J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 18(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 28777096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
    Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose to nurses, cardiologists, and patients during coronary angiography: a comparison of femoral and radial access.
    Wilson-Stewart KS; Fontanarosa D; Malacova E; Trapp JV
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2022 Jun; 21(4):325-331. PubMed ID: 34718509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study.
    Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    McCutcheon K; Vanhaverbeke M; Pauwels R; Dabin J; Schoonjans W; Bennett J; Adriaenssens T; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Desmet W
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009627. PubMed ID: 33092401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing Staff Dose in Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventions by Comparing Clinical Data with Phantom Experiments.
    Sailer AM; Paulis L; Vergoossen L; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CRLPN
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2019 May; 30(5):701-708.e1. PubMed ID: 30952523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extended Protective Shield Under Table to Reduce Operator Radiation Dose in Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.
    Sciahbasi A; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Patrizi R; Cera M; Di Russo C; Zezza L; Fedele S; Ferraiuolo G
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007586. PubMed ID: 30732471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. OCCUPATIONAL EYE LENS DOSE ESTIMATED USING WHOLE-BODY DOSEMETER IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY AND RADIOLOGY: A MONTE CARLO STUDY.
    Božović P; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Petrović JS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):135-142. PubMed ID: 30624754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational radiation exposure in femoral artery approach is higher than radial artery approach during coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kim JS; Lee BK; Ryu DR; Chun K; Kwon HS; Nam SR; Kim DI; Lee SY; Jeong JO; Bae JW; Park JS; Ahn Y; Chae JK; Yoon MH; Lee SH; Yoon J; Gwon HC; Choi D; Kwon SM; Roh YH; Cho BR
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7104. PubMed ID: 32346022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.