51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3436119)
1. [Material selective imaging and density measurement with the dual energy method. III. Determination of bone mineral of the spine with CT].
Kalender W; Felsenberg D; Süss C
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Dec; 7(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 3436119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quantitative computerized tomographic determination of bone mineral content].
Felsenberg D; Kalender WA; Banzer D; Schmilinsky G; Heyse M; Fischer E; Schneider U
Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 2834792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of bone mineral density after percutaneous kyphoplasty in fresh osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and adjacent vertebrae along with sagittal spine alignment.
Korovessis P; Zacharatos S; Repantis T; Michael A; Karachalios D
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 18525491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [An experimental study of quantitative bone mineral analysis using computed tomography with calibration phantom].
Shimizu H
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Dec; 62(12):1199-210. PubMed ID: 3249102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Material-selective imaging and density measurement using the dual-energy method. I. Principles and methodology].
Kalender W; Bautz W; Felsenberg D; Süss C; Klotz E
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Jun; 7(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 3621809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quantitative mineral estimations in vertebral bodies by computer tomography (author's transl)].
Banzer D; Schneider U; Wegener OH; Oeser H; Pleul O
Rofo; 1979 Jan; 130(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 153315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Densitometry analysis with quantitative computerized tomography in 530 subjects from Southern Italy].
Addesso AM; Cinque T; Del Vecchio W; Salvi V; Schillirò F
Radiol Med; 1996 Oct; 92(4):363-6. PubMed ID: 9045232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].
Yang DZ; Shang JY; Song WZ; Chen J; Zhu D; Wang WZ
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 12905736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of bone marrow fat on the determination of bone mineral content by QCT].
Ikeda T; Sakurai K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Aug; 54(9):886-96. PubMed ID: 7936987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. II. Determination of vertebral bone mineral content.
Vetter JR; Perman WH; Kalender WA; Mazess RB; Holden JE
Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 3724694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT.
Kalender WA; Klotz E; Suess C
Radiology; 1987 Aug; 164(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 3602380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative CT of the spine. Significance of intervertebral body variability.
Thickman D; Nodine C; Iddenden D
Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 2298545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic errors in bone-mineral measurements by quantitative computed tomography.
Rao GU; Yaghmai I; Wist AO; Arora G
Med Phys; 1987; 14(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 3561338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Experimental studies on the accuracy of mineral content assessment in spongiosa bone using quantitative CT (single energy measurement)].
Rohloff R; Hitzler H; Arndt W; Frey KW
Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 3001863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of calibration materials in single- and dual-energy quantitative CT.
Steenbeek JC; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL
Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):849-55. PubMed ID: 1584946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of vertebral mineral determination by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography.
Reinbold WD; Adler CP; Kalender WA; Lente R
Skeletal Radiol; 1991; 20(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 2000501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of vertebral fat content on quantitative CT density.
Laval-Jeantet AM; Roger B; Bouysee S; Bergot C; Mazess RB
Radiology; 1986 May; 159(2):463-6. PubMed ID: 3961178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value and limitations of the computed x-ray tomographic measurement of vertebral mineralization].
Laval-Jeantet AM; Laval-Jeantet M; Roger B; Scott C; Delmas PF
J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 65(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 6716345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone mineral assessment: new dual-energy CT approach.
Nickoloff EL; Feldman F; Atherton JV
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 3380964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
