BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

51 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3436119)

  • 21. Assessment of calibration methods for estimating bone mineral densities in trauma patients with quantitative CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study.
    Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson SC; Kazerooni EA
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Sep; 8(9):822-34. PubMed ID: 11724037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Precise measurement of vertebral bone density using computed tomography without the use of an external reference phantom.
    Boden SD; Goodenough DJ; Stockham CD; Jacobs E; Dina T; Allman RM
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 Feb; 2(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 2488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Clinical studies of the quantitative changes in mineral salt content of irradiated vertebral body metastases with 2-energy computerized tomography].
    Crone-Münzebrock W; Spielmann RP; Brockmann WP
    Rontgenblatter; 1988 Jun; 41(6):223-8. PubMed ID: 3136537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Beam hardening errors in post-processing dual energy quantitative computed tomography.
    Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1039-47. PubMed ID: 7565378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of collagen on bone mineral analysis with CT.
    Goodsitt MM; Kilcoyne RF; Gutcheck RA; Richardson ML; Rosenthal DI
    Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):787-91. PubMed ID: 3363141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative study of bone mineral density estimated by various methods of single- and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography: the capability of the four-equation four-unknown method.
    Tanno M; Horiuchi T; Ogihara M; Kishino T; Mashima Y; Endoh K; Karube S; Igarashi M; Yamada H
    Bone; 1996 Mar; 18(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 8703579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Selection of fat-equivalent materials in postprocessing dual-energy quantitative CT.
    Steenbeek JC; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL; van Panthaleon van Eck RB
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1051-6. PubMed ID: 1518467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The effect of beam hardening on CT values].
    Weidenmaier W; Christ G
    Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 3001864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Empirical beam hardening correction in the measurement of vertebral bone mineral content by computed tomography.
    Imamura K; Fujii M
    Radiology; 1981 Jan; 138(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 7470214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determination of electron density, mass density and calcium fraction by mass of soft and osseous tissues by dual energy CT.
    Henson PW
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1989 Mar; 12(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 2705962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Repositioning errors in measurement of vertebral attenuation values by computed tomography.
    Breatnach E; Robinson PJ
    Br J Radiol; 1983 May; 56(665):299-305. PubMed ID: 6850211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [A structural parameter for characterizing early trabecular changes in the spine in osteoporosis].
    Klepper R; Johner C; Hesch RD
    Rofo; 1993 Oct; 159(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 8219119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Effects of beam weakening and beam hardening on the measured CT values].
    Schultz E; Lackner K
    Computertomographie; 1981 Jun; 1(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 7187286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The potential accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the determination of hepatic iron.
    Sephton RG
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Apr; 59(700):351-3. PubMed ID: 3697612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of postprocessing dual-energy methods in quantitative computed tomography. Part 2. Practical aspects.
    van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL; Steenbeek JC; Schütte HE; Trouerbach WT
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Aug; 25(8):882-9. PubMed ID: 2394570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [An experimental study to evaluate mineralization of vertebral bone by computerized tomography (author's transl)].
    Laval-Jeantet M; Laval-Jeantet AM; Lamarque JL; Demoulin B
    J Radiol; 1979 Feb; 60(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 490468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of calcium concentration in bones from CT scans.
    Bradley JG; Huang HK; Ledley RS
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 663193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some practical aspects of dual-energy CT scanning.
    Dunscombe PB; Katz DE; Stacey AJ
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Jan; 57(673):82-7. PubMed ID: 6704653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Material selective imaging and density measurement with the dual energy method. III. Determination of bone mineral of the spine with CT].
    Kalender W; Felsenberg D; Süss C
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Dec; 7(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 3436119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
    Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.