158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34361299)
1. Accuracy Evaluation of Additively and Subtractively Fabricated Palatal Plate Orthodontic Appliances for Newborns and Infants-An In Vitro Study.
Aretxabaleta M; Unkovskiy A; Koos B; Spintzyk S; Xepapadeas AB
Materials (Basel); 2021 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 34361299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of additive manufacturing method and build angle on the accuracy of 3D-printed palatal plates.
Dai J; Li P; Spintzyk S; Liu C; Xu S
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104449. PubMed ID: 36773740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21.
Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31973720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis.
Unkovskiy A; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Li P; Spintzyk S; Kraemer Fernandez P
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 33806627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of zirconia crown manufactured using stereolithography and digital light processing.
Lee HB; Noh MJ; Bae EJ; Lee WS; Kim JH
J Dent; 2024 Feb; 141():104834. PubMed ID: 38217958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part II: 3D printed Tübingen palatal plate prototype for newborns with Robin sequence.
Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):171. PubMed ID: 32546229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of manufacturing technologies on the surface accuracy of CAD-CAM occlusal splints.
Orgev A; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):697-705. PubMed ID: 36227731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Load of an Orthodontic Appliance for Robin Sequence Treatment in a Digital Workflow.
Aretxabaleta M; Xepapadeas AB; Poets CF; Koos B; Spintzyk S
Materials (Basel); 2021 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 33445670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface trueness and precision of interim restorations fabricated by digital light processing and CAD-CAM milling systems.
Thomas AA; Daniel AY; Gandhi N; Roy N; Varghese KG; Wadhwa S; Mathew JE
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):611.e1-611.e7. PubMed ID: 37643941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner.
Revilla-León M; Young K; Sicilia E; Cho SH; Kois JC
J Dent; 2022 May; 120():104114. PubMed ID: 35358659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Build Angle and Artificial Aging on the Accuracy of SLA- and DLP-Printed Occlusal Devices.
Saadat Sarmadi B; Schmidt F; Beuer F; Metin DS; Simeon P; Nicic R; Unkovskiy A
Polymers (Basel); 2024 Jun; 16(12):. PubMed ID: 38932064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies.
Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers.
Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and its impact on fit of injection molded, milled and additively manufactured occlusal splints.
Wesemann C; Spies BC; Schaefer D; Adali U; Beuer F; Pieralli S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104179. PubMed ID: 33189599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
