These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34363196)

  • 1. The benefits of impossible tests: Assessing the role of error-correction in the pretesting effect.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Inkster AB; Hollins TJ
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):296-311. PubMed ID: 34363196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pretesting boosts item but not source memory.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Hollins TJ
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 34534032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):899-905. PubMed ID: 22688538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. You won't guess that: On the limited benefits of guessing when learning a foreign language.
    Butowska E; Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1033-1047. PubMed ID: 34913140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why does guessing incorrectly enhance, rather than impair, retention?
    Yan VX; Yu Y; Garcia MA; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1373-83. PubMed ID: 25120240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Hollins TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32959192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeated guessing attempts during acquisition can promote subsequent recall performance.
    Kliegl O; Bartl J; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Jun; 30(2):282-292. PubMed ID: 37561423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefit of generating errors during learning.
    Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):644-67. PubMed ID: 23815457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefit of generating errors during learning: What is the locus of the effect?
    Potts R; Davies G; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1023-1041. PubMed ID: 30024254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of feedback on predictions of future memory performance.
    Sitzman DM; Rhodes MG; Kornell N
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1102-13. PubMed ID: 27245926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free recall test experience potentiates strategy-driven effects of value on memory.
    Cohen MS; Rissman J; Hovhannisyan M; Castel AD; Knowlton BJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1581-1601. PubMed ID: 28394160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elaborative processing and conjunction errors in recognition memory.
    Arndt J; Jones TC
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jul; 36(5):899-912. PubMed ID: 18630197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spelling recognition after exposure to misspellings: implications for abstractionist vs. episodic theories of orthographic representations.
    Burt JS; Salzgeber A; Carroll MF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Mar; 142(3):383-93. PubMed ID: 23434881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guessing versus misremembering in recognition: A comparison of continuous, two-high-threshold, and low-threshold models.
    Starns JJ; Ma Q
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):527-539. PubMed ID: 28933897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two routes to memory benefits of guessing.
    Zawadzka K; Hanczakowski M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 30570326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the contributions of task expectancy in the testing and guessing benefits on recognition memory.
    Huff MJ; Yates TJ; Balota DA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1065-1083. PubMed ID: 29723114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of recalling previous errors in middle-school children's learning.
    Loehr AM; Fazio LK; Rittle-Johnson B
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2020 Dec; 90(4):997-1014. PubMed ID: 31999838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective effects of errorful generation on recognition memory: the role of motivation and surprise.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Waters JL; Hollins TJ
    Memory; 2019 Oct; 27(9):1250-1262. PubMed ID: 31369344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.