These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34363790)

  • 21. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
    Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase.
    Bonino AY; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.
    Zhao J; Guo J; Zhou F; Shu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1761-70. PubMed ID: 21382389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic correlates of female confidence: A production and comprehension study.
    Roche JM; Morgan SD; Fissel Brannick S; Bryndel K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3410. PubMed ID: 31255138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.
    Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.
    Kong YY; Jesse A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):373. PubMed ID: 28147573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Encoding and decoding of meaning through structured variability in intonational speech prosody.
    Xie X; Buxó-Lugo A; Kurumada C
    Cognition; 2021 Jun; 211():104619. PubMed ID: 33601018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Voornaam is not (really) a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch.
    Cutler A; van Donselaar W
    Lang Speech; 2001 Jun; 44(Pt 2):171-95. PubMed ID: 11575903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Processing of word stress related acoustic information: A multi-feature MMN study.
    Honbolygó F; Kolozsvári O; Csépe V
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Aug; 118():9-17. PubMed ID: 28549538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does Talker-Specific Information Influence Lexical Competition? Evidence From Phonological Priming.
    Dufour S; Nguyen N
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2221-2233. PubMed ID: 27943403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification of vowel length, word stress, and compound words and phrases by postlingually deafened cochlear implant listeners.
    Morris D; Magnusson L; Faulkner A; Jönsson R; Juul H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):879-90. PubMed ID: 24224994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lexical Segmentation in Artificial Word Learning: The Effects of Converging Sublexical Cues.
    Bagou O; Frauenfelder UH
    Lang Speech; 2018 Mar; 61(1):3-30. PubMed ID: 29280405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Talker variability is not always the right noise: 14 month olds struggle to learn dissimilar word-object pairs under talker variability conditions.
    Bulgarelli F; Bergelson E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Mar; 227():105575. PubMed ID: 36395621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.