These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3436554)

  • 1. [Comparative evaluation of hemodynamic indicators of spherical and disk prostheses in aortic position].
    Orlov AN; Machulin AV
    Grudn Khir; 1987; (6):40-3. PubMed ID: 3436554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Prima stentless valve.
    Konertz W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):441-2. PubMed ID: 9263879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tilting-disc versus bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic position: a multicenter evaluation.
    Vitale N; De Feo M; De Siena P; Cappabianca G; Onorati F; Gregorio R; Branzoli S; de Luca L; Schinosa T; Viganò M; Scardone M; Cotrufo M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S27-34. PubMed ID: 15224997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Clinico-hemodynamic evaluation of Soviet aortic ball prostheses in long-term follow-up studies].
    Tsukerman GI; Semenovskiĭ ML; Petrosian IuS; Bogomolova MP; Narsiia BE
    Grudn Khir; 1984; (1):31-5. PubMed ID: 6706197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Hemodynamic assessment of patients with aortic or mitral valve replacement during exercise (author's transl)].
    Kraus F; Rudolph W
    Herz; 1981 Jun; 6(3):138-47. PubMed ID: 7250886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Hemodynamic rest and stress studies following implantation of various aortic valve prostheses].
    Horstkotte D; Haerten K; Körfer R; Spiller P; Budde T; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Aug; 72(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 6624185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic evaluation of patients with double-valve prostheses.
    Baxley WA
    Herz; 1981 Jun; 6(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 7250887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of left ventricular hemodynamics and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with homografts or mechanical valves.
    Basarir S; Islamoglu F; Ozkisacik E; Atay Y; Boga M; Bakalim T; Ozbaran M; Telli A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10678375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Use of radioisotope angiocardiography by the gate method for evaluation of hemodynamic effects of aortic valve implantation in patients with aortic valve insufficiency].
    Kuśmierek J; Kress P; Adam WE
    Pol Przegl Radiol; 1988; 52(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2855112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the 21 mm Björk-Shiley aortic valve prosthesis].
    Nishiwaki M; Shida T; Inoue K; Sawada K; Nakamura K
    Kyobu Geka; 1986 Sep; 39(9):713-7. PubMed ID: 3795666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: effect of patient age.
    Biglioli P; Spampinato N; Cannata A; Musumeci A; Parolari A; Gagliardi C; Alamanni F
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13 Suppl 1():S49-51. PubMed ID: 15225002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relevant factors in establishment of the indication for valve replacement in aortic regurgitation.
    Rudolph C; Kraus F; Hall D; Klein U; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():117-9. PubMed ID: 3727672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis.
    Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemodynamic assessment of the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Nardi C; Scioti G; Milano AD; De Carlo M; Bortolotti U
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 11206755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Assessment of myocardial function].
    Rothlin M; Gattiker K
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1973 Jun; 66(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 4199789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Functional evaluation of the aortic valve prosthesis].
    Aigner A; Baumgarti P; Knapp E; Müller G; Raas E
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1972 Mar; 102(9):298-302. PubMed ID: 5014015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The aortic Elan stentless aortic valve: excellent hemodynamics and ease of implantation.
    Flynn M; Iaccovoni A; Pathi V; Butler J; Macarthur KJ; Berg GA
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):48-54. PubMed ID: 11805949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Hemodynamic plus series of St. Jude medical valve prosthesis in aortic position: early clinical outcome and reconsideration of its application].
    Katsumata T; Kitamura M; Tsuchida K; Hachida M; Endo M; Hashimoto A; Koyanagi H
    Kyobu Geka; 1996 Mar; 49(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 8709423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Miller FA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.