123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34365589)
21. Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material on Websites of Breast Imaging Centers.
Choudhery S; Xi Y; Chen H; Aboul-Fettouh N; Goldenmerry Y; Ho C; Viroslav H; Zhang C; Goudreau S
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 32428435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality and readability of online resources on chronic ankle instability.
Schwarz GM; Lisy M; Hajdu S; Windhager R; Willegger M
Foot Ankle Surg; 2022 Apr; 28(3):384-389. PubMed ID: 34083141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quality and Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Information on Common Prosthodontic Treatments.
Alshehri A; Alghofaili N; ALshunaiber R; Alkadi L
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):62–67. PubMed ID: 33651024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quality Analysis of Online Patient Resources for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Li JZH; McLeod J; Ingledew PA
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Jan; 56(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 33337639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Analysis of the quality of meningioma education resources available on the Internet.
Lim CA; Ingledew PA
Neurooncol Pract; 2021 Apr; 8(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35112670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.
Corredera E; Davis KS; Simons JP; Jabbour N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():175-179. PubMed ID: 29605350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.
Yan Q; Field AR; Jensen KJ; Goei C; Jiang Z; Davies MG
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2021 Jul; 9(4):1017-1024.e7. PubMed ID: 33340728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Readability of online patient resources for the operative treatment of breast cancer.
Vargas CR; Chuang DJ; Ganor O; Lee BT
Surgery; 2014 Aug; 156(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 24953268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Risks Associated With Computed Tomography Scans: An Assessment of the Readability and Reliability of Online Text Available for Patient Information and Guidance.
Hemaya M; Hemaya M; Habeeb A
Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30758. PubMed ID: 36447695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Brain death and the internet: evaluating the readability and quality of online health information.
Guven Kose S; Kose HC; Erbakan M; Tulgar S
Minerva Anestesiol; 2022 Sep; 88(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 35199972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Readability of websites containing information about prostate cancer treatment options.
Ellimoottil C; Polcari A; Kadlec A; Gupta G
J Urol; 2012 Dec; 188(6):2171-5. PubMed ID: 23083852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluating the Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Resources Pertaining to Hallux Valgus.
Tartaglione JP; Rosenbaum AJ; Abousayed M; Hushmendy SF; DiPreta JA
Foot Ankle Spec; 2016 Feb; 9(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 26123550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
