These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34365857)

  • 1. A Review of Mechano-Biochemical Models for Testing Composite Restorations.
    Zhang A; Ye N; Aregawi W; Zhang L; Salah M; VanHeel B; Chew HP; Fok ASL
    J Dent Res; 2021 Sep; 100(10):1030-1038. PubMed ID: 34365857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and calibration of biochemical models for testing dental restorations.
    Zhang A; Chen R; Aregawi W; He Y; Wang S; Aparicio C; Rudney J; Chew HP; Fok AS
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Jun; 109():132-141. PubMed ID: 32289496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interfacial degradation of adhesive composite restorations mediated by oral biofilms and mechanical challenge in an extracted tooth model of secondary caries.
    Carrera CA; Li Y; Chen R; Aparicio C; Fok A; Rudney J
    J Dent; 2017 Nov; 66():62-70. PubMed ID: 28843960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hydrophobic and antimicrobial dentin: A peptide-based 2-tier protective system for dental resin composite restorations.
    Moussa DG; Fok A; Aparicio C
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Apr; 88():251-265. PubMed ID: 30753942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Mar; 3(3):CD010526. PubMed ID: 30834516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Schenkel AB; Peltz I; Veitz-Keenan A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD010526. PubMed ID: 27780315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of adhesive materials and oral biofilm in the failure of adhesive resin restorations.
    Pinna R; Usai P; Filigheddu E; Garcia-Godoy F; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2017 Oct; 30(5):285-292. PubMed ID: 29178733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
    Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human neutrophils degrade methacrylate resin composites and tooth dentin.
    Gitalis R; Zhou L; Marashdeh MQ; Sun C; Glogauer M; Finer Y
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Apr; 88():325-331. PubMed ID: 30807874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biochemical Stability and Interactions of Dental Resin Composites and Adhesives with Host and Bacteria in the Oral Cavity: A Review.
    Bourbia M; Finer Y
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2018 Jan; 84():i1. PubMed ID: 29513214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The microfloral analysis of secondary caries biofilm around Class I and Class II composite and amalgam fillings.
    Mo SS; Bao W; Lai GY; Wang J; Li MY
    BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Aug; 10():241. PubMed ID: 20712908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cyclic mechanical loading promotes bacterial penetration along composite restoration marginal gaps.
    Khvostenko D; Salehi S; Naleway SE; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25900624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro investigation of marginal dentine caries abutting composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Craig GG; Mulyani ; Zilm PS; Gully NJ
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17969286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.