These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3436620)
21. Comparison processes on visual mental images. Bagnara S; Simion F; Tagliabue ME; Umiltà C Mem Cognit; 1988 Mar; 16(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 3352519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: an attentional range effect. LaBerge D; Brown V Percept Psychophys; 1986 Sep; 40(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 3774503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Reaction times of younger and older men and temporal contingencies of reinforcement. Baron A; Menich SR; Perone M J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):275-87. PubMed ID: 6655425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Changes in the reference system exemplified by a visual assessment task]. Junghanns G; Ullsperger P; Metz AM Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1988; 196(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 2906773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Asymmetry in human discrimination learning: feature positive effect or focus of hypothesis effect? Fiedler K; Eckert C; Poysiak C Acta Psychol (Amst); 1989 Mar; 70(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 2741708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Is time to scan visual images due to demand characteristics? Jolicoeur P; Kosslyn SM Mem Cognit; 1985 Jul; 13(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 4079748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image. Kinchla RA; Solis-Macias V; Hoffman J Percept Psychophys; 1983 Jan; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6844087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Numeral size, spacing between targets, and exposure time in discrimination by elderly people using an lcd monitor. Huang KC; Yeh PC Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Apr; 104(2):543-6. PubMed ID: 17566444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Age changes in selective search. Vlietstra AG J Genet Psychol; 1982 Sep; 141(1st Half):147-8. PubMed ID: 7142982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. On the detection of letters within redundant arrays. Johnson NF Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3763365 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search. Madden DJ Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Same-different judgments of foveal and parafoveal letter pairs by older adults. Krueger LE; Allen PA Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 3588230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Age differences in what is viewed and remembered in complex conjunction search. Williams CC; Zacks RT; Henderson JM Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):946-66. PubMed ID: 18932061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of associative and perceptual interference. Grice GR; Canham L; Schafer C Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 7155783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Adult age differences in integrative spatial ability. Salthouse TA Psychol Aging; 1987 Sep; 2(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 3268216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamic vs static stimuli in their effect on visual vigilance performance. Koelega HS; Brinkman JA; Zwep B; Verbaten MN Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):823-31. PubMed ID: 2377416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]