These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dynamic vs static stimuli in their effect on visual vigilance performance. Koelega HS; Brinkman JA; Zwep B; Verbaten MN Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):823-31. PubMed ID: 2377416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limitations of the cognitive vigilance increment. Loeb M; Noonan TK; Ash DW; Holding DH Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):661-74. PubMed ID: 3436622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Changes in the reference system exemplified by a visual assessment task]. Junghanns G; Ullsperger P; Metz AM Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1988; 196(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 2906773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of task type and stimulus heterogeneity on the event rate function in sustained attention. Lanzetta TM; Dember WN; Warm JS; Berch DB Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):625-33. PubMed ID: 3436619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Signal detection theory and probability matching apply to vigilance. Craig A Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 3436621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Attention to compounds by retarded adults. McLean J Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Jul; 83(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 677183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A two-term exponential functional description of the time course of sustained attention. Giambra LM; Quilter RE Hum Factors; 1987 Dec; 29(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 3436620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of intradimensional and extradimensional shifts on visual discrimination learning in humans and non-human primates. Roberts AC; Robbins TW; Everitt BJ Q J Exp Psychol B; 1988 Nov; 40(4):321-41. PubMed ID: 3145534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjustment of an observer to a limited set of pictures in the course of an experiment. Glezer VD; Kostelyanets NB; Levkovich YuI Hum Physiol; 1979; 5(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 548441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Individual differences in multi-task response strategies. Damos D; Smist T Aviat Space Environ Med; 1982 Dec; 53(12):1177-81. PubMed ID: 7159337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Manual card sorting compared to automatic card presentation for assessing visual lobe size. Courtney AJ; Chan HS Ergonomics; 1986 Dec; 29(12):1553-60. PubMed ID: 3816748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of hashish on vigilance performance. Bahri T; Amir T Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Feb; 78(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 8177645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More rapid visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus. Inamori Y; Inamori R Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):570. PubMed ID: 2342858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of a modal completion on visual matching. Gerbino W; Salmaso D Acta Psychol (Amst); 1987 Jun; 65(1):25-46. PubMed ID: 3618293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults. Parasuraman R; Nestor P; Greenwood P Psychol Aging; 1989 Sep; 4(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 2803627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings. Proctor RW; Healy AF Percept Psychophys; 1987 Aug; 42(2):180-94. PubMed ID: 3627939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple measures of visual-lobe size and search performance. Courtney AJ; Chau HS Ergonomics; 1985 Sep; 28(9):1319-31. PubMed ID: 4065088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymmetry in human discrimination learning: feature positive effect or focus of hypothesis effect? Fiedler K; Eckert C; Poysiak C Acta Psychol (Amst); 1989 Mar; 70(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 2741708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Spatial attention: objections to the spotlight model of visual selectivity]. Buchner A Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1988; 35(4):523-45. PubMed ID: 3218272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]