281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34366285)
1. Disparate Responses in Match Outcome across Competitive Surgical Subspecialties to Pandemic Era Constraints: An Analysis of Impacts of Minimal Auditions.
Faletsky A; Zitkovsky H; Guo L
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):243-248. PubMed ID: 34366285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Impact of COVID-19 on Plastic Surgery Home Program Match Rates.
Faletsky A; Zitkovsky H; Guo L
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jan; 88(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 34393193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Home Field Advantage: Assessing the Geographic Trends of the Plastic Surgery Residency Match during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Asadourian PA; Murphy AI; Marano AA; Rohde CH; Wu JK
J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):1923-1929. PubMed ID: 34210645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geographic Trends in the Neurosurgery Match During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Moya AN; Whisonant CT; Shahriari SRK; McDonald CD; Ederle AC; Laarakker AS; Borah GL
Neurosurgery; 2023 May; 92(5):e104-e110. PubMed ID: 36705514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Importance of Sub-Internships on the 2022 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match During Continued COVID-19 Regulations.
Sinik LM; Egan KG; Bagwell AK; Nauta AC; Butterworth JA
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(6):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 35931604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What COVID Restrictions Have Taught Us About Visiting Subinternships.
Zitkovsky HS; Kuhn NL; Guo L
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):478-481. PubMed ID: 37146313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. COVID-19 and the Otolaryngology Match: An Increase in Applicants Remaining Close to Home.
Whisonant CT; Shahriari SR; McDonald CD; Moya AN; Ederle A; Borah G
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23650. PubMed ID: 35505731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. COVID-19 and the Otolaryngology Residency Match: Rising Incidence of Home Matches.
Bernstein JD; Harmon M; Watson D
Laryngoscope; 2022 Oct; 132(10):1934-1938. PubMed ID: 35038190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Home Program Advantage in the Otolaryngology Residency Match.
Nathan AS; Richards PQ; Ryll LS; Garg N; Garcia A; Kan K; Levi JR
J Surg Educ; 2023 Dec; 80(12):1877-1884. PubMed ID: 37634977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Does Geographic Region Affect the Total and Individual Costs for Medical Students Applying to the Competitive Surgical Residencies?
Gordon AM; Ahlering TE
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):147-156. PubMed ID: 34535435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors influencing medical student choices in the integrated vascular surgery match: Implications for future post-pandemic residency matches.
Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Chandra V; Coleman DM; Lee JT
J Vasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 74(4):1354-1361.e4. PubMed ID: 34023431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of COVID-19 Restrictions on 2021 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match Outcomes.
Egan KG; Nauta A; Butterworth JA
J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(1):249-252. PubMed ID: 34326033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Did More Otolaryngology Residency Applicants Match at Their Home Institutions in 2021? Investigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Mulcahy CF; Terhaar SJ; Boulos S; Lee E; Zapanta PE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2022 Dec; 131(12):1375-1380. PubMed ID: 35081777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Osteopathic (DO) and Allopathic (MD) Candidates Matching Into Selected Surgical Subspecialties.
Brazdzionis J; Savla P; Oppenheim R; Kim GJ; Conrad-Schnetz K; Burns B; Beier A; Connett DA; Miulli DE
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40566. PubMed ID: 37465803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ophthalmology Residency Match in the Covid-19 Era: Applicant and Program Director Perceptions of the 2020-2021 Application Cycle.
Venincasa MJ; Steren B; Young BK; Parikh A; Ahmed B; Sridhar J; Kombo N
Semin Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 33825672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match During the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic.
Whisonant CT; Shahriari SR; Harrison J; Ederle A; Marley SJ; Dowdy-Sue HE; Borah G
Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e16988. PubMed ID: 34540391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Urology Residency Match and Geographic Proximity of Applicants.
Wang KR; Shah YB; Simhal RK; Quinn A; Denisenko A; Mann E; Clark J; Raikin J; Lallas CD
Urology; 2023 Jun; 176():21-27. PubMed ID: 36963668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual Interviews During COVID-19 Changed Neurosurgery Match-for Better or Worse.
Kabangu JK; Yekzaman BR; Heskett CA; Rouse AG; Chamoun RB
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jan; 181():e177-e181. PubMed ID: 37777177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Match Patterns.
Sama AJ; Schiller NC; Perez AR; Cohen JL; Donnally CJ; Dodds SD
Iowa Orthop J; 2023; 43(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 37383866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
