188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34368847)
41. Quantifying the mapping precision of genome-wide association studies using whole-genome sequencing data.
Wu Y; Zheng Z; Visscher PM; Yang J
Genome Biol; 2017 May; 18(1):86. PubMed ID: 28506277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Imputation of ungenotyped parental genotypes in dairy and beef cattle from progeny genotypes.
Berry DP; McParland S; Kearney JF; Sargolzaei M; Mullen MP
Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 24840560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Concordance rate between copy number variants detected using either high- or medium-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotype panels and the potential of imputing copy number variants from flanking high density single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in cattle.
Rafter P; Gormley IC; Parnell AC; Kearney JF; Berry DP
BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):205. PubMed ID: 32131735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies.
Howie BN; Donnelly P; Marchini J
PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000529. PubMed ID: 19543373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Founder population-specific HapMap panel increases power in GWA studies through improved imputation accuracy and CNV tagging.
Surakka I; Kristiansson K; Anttila V; Inouye M; Barnes C; Moutsianas L; Salomaa V; Daly M; Palotie A; Peltonen L; Ripatti S
Genome Res; 2010 Oct; 20(10):1344-51. PubMed ID: 20810666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The impact of multi-generational genotype imputation strategies on imputation accuracy and subsequent genomic predictions.
Judge MM; Purfield DC; Sleator RD; Berry DP
J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1489-1501. PubMed ID: 28464096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Analysis of untyped SNPs: maximum likelihood and imputation methods.
Hu YJ; Lin DY
Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 34(8):803-15. PubMed ID: 21104886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Improved imputation accuracy of rare and low-frequency variants using population-specific high-coverage WGS-based imputation reference panel.
Mitt M; Kals M; Pärn K; Gabriel SB; Lander ES; Palotie A; Ripatti S; Morris AP; Metspalu A; Esko T; Mägi R; Palta P
Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Jun; 25(7):869-876. PubMed ID: 28401899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Genotype imputation using the Positional Burrows Wheeler Transform.
Rubinacci S; Delaneau O; Marchini J
PLoS Genet; 2020 Nov; 16(11):e1009049. PubMed ID: 33196638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Imputation accuracy to whole-genome sequence in Nellore cattle.
Fernandes Júnior GA; Carvalheiro R; de Oliveira HN; Sargolzaei M; Costilla R; Ventura RV; Fonseca LFS; Neves HHR; Hayes BJ; de Albuquerque LG
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Mar; 53(1):27. PubMed ID: 33711929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Systematic assessment of imputation performance using the 1000 Genomes reference panels.
Liu Q; Cirulli ET; Han Y; Yao S; Liu S; Zhu Q
Brief Bioinform; 2015 Jul; 16(4):549-62. PubMed ID: 25246238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Why are rare variants hard to impute? Coalescent models reveal theoretical limits in existing algorithms.
Si Y; Vanderwerff B; Zöllner S
Genetics; 2021 Apr; 217(4):. PubMed ID: 33686438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. GWAS on Imputed Whole-Genome Resequencing From Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data for Farrowing Interval of Different Parities in Pigs.
Wu P; Wang K; Zhou J; Chen D; Yang Q; Yang X; Liu Y; Feng B; Jiang A; Shen L; Xiao W; Jiang Y; Zhu L; Zeng Y; Xu X; Li X; Tang G
Front Genet; 2019; 10():1012. PubMed ID: 31681435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies.
Marchini J; Howie B
Nat Rev Genet; 2010 Jul; 11(7):499-511. PubMed ID: 20517342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. One thousand genomes imputation in the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium aggressive prostate cancer genome-wide association study.
Machiela MJ; Chen C; Liang L; Diver WR; Stevens VL; Tsilidis KK; Haiman CA; Chanock SJ; Hunter DJ; Kraft P;
Prostate; 2013 May; 73(7):677-89. PubMed ID: 23255287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. GIGI: an approach to effective imputation of dense genotypes on large pedigrees.
Cheung CY; Thompson EA; Wijsman EM
Am J Hum Genet; 2013 Apr; 92(4):504-16. PubMed ID: 23561844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. How local reference panels improve imputation in French populations.
Herzig AF; Velo-Suárez L; ; ; Dina C; Redon R; Deleuze JF; Génin E
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):370. PubMed ID: 38172507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Re-ranking sequencing variants in the post-GWAS era for accurate causal variant identification.
Faye LL; Machiela MJ; Kraft P; Bull SB; Sun L
PLoS Genet; 2013; 9(8):e1003609. PubMed ID: 23950724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
