BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34369418)

  • 1. A Slight Increase in Reverberation Time in the Classroom Affects Performance and Behavioral Listening Effort.
    Prodi N; Visentin C
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):460-476. PubMed ID: 34369418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.
    Klatte M; Lachmann T; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):270-82. PubMed ID: 20871182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise, Age, and Gender Effects on Speech Intelligibility and Sentence Comprehension for 11- to 13-Year-Old Children in Real Classrooms.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Borella E; Mammarella IC; Di Domenico A
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2166. PubMed ID: 31607991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Picou EM; Gordon J; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 26372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.
    Wróblewski M; Lewis DE; Valente DL; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 22732772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating Listening Effort in Classrooms for 5- to 7-Year-Old Children.
    Prodi N; Visentin C; Peretti A; Griguolo J; Bartolucci GB
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2019 Apr; 50(2):196-210. PubMed ID: 31017855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative Effect of Acoustic Panels on Listening Effort in a Classroom Environment.
    Amlani AM; Russo TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):805-815. PubMed ID: 27885976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Moderate Reverberation Does Not Increase Subjective Fatigue, Subjective Listening Effort, or Behavioral Listening Effort in School-Aged Children.
    Picou EM; Bean B; Marcrum SC; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BWY
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1749. PubMed ID: 31428016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening to a Dysphonic Speaker in Noise May Impede Children's Spoken Language Processing in a Realistic Classroom Setting.
    Schiller IS; Morsomme D; Kob M; Remacle A
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Jan; 52(1):396-408. PubMed ID: 33375854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual characteristics moderate listening effort in noisy classrooms.
    Visentin C; Pellegatti M; Garraffa M; Di Domenico A; Prodi N
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):14285. PubMed ID: 37652970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of noise and reverberation on speech recognition and listening effort for older adults.
    Kwak C; Han W; Lee J; Kim J; Kim S
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2018 Dec; 18(12):1603-1608. PubMed ID: 30328231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms.
    Vickers DA; Backus BC; Macdonald NK; Rostamzadeh NK; Mason NK; Pandya R; Marriage JE; Mahon MH
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 23340455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Be Quiet! Effects of Competing Speakers and Individual Characteristics on Listening Comprehension for Primary School Students.
    Visentin C; Pellegatti M; Garraffa M; Di Domenico A; Prodi N
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Perception in Classroom Acoustics by Children With Hearing Loss and Wearing Hearing Aids.
    Iglehart F
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Mar; 29(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 31835909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Review of the Effect of Classroom Sound-Field Amplification on Children in Primary School.
    Mealings K
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):470-486. PubMed ID: 35344396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.
    Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.