These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34369572)

  • 1. Training for communication in forensic science.
    Hoffman BL; Hackman L; Lindenfeld LA
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2021 Sep; 5(3):359-365. PubMed ID: 34369572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices.
    Bali AS; Edmond G; Ballantyne KN; Kemp RI; Martire KA
    Sci Justice; 2020 May; 60(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 32381238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts.
    Reid CA; Howes LM
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):108-119. PubMed ID: 32111283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research.
    Howes LM
    Sci Justice; 2015 Mar; 55(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25754001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conceptualising, evaluating and communicating uncertainty in forensic science: Identifying commonly used tools through an interdisciplinary configurative review.
    Georgiou N; Morgan RM; French JC
    Sci Justice; 2020 Jul; 60(4):313-336. PubMed ID: 32650934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Renegotiating forensic cultures: between law, science and criminal justice.
    Roberts P
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2013 Mar; 44(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 23022585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency.
    Passalacqua NV; Pilloud MA; Belcher WR
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):573-579. PubMed ID: 31472803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel scientific methods in court.
    Hackman L; Nic Daeid N
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2021 Sep; 5(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 34402863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners.
    Edmond G; Towler A; Growns B; Ribeiro G; Found B; White D; Ballantyne K; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM; Kemp RI; Martire K
    Sci Justice; 2017 Mar; 57(2):144-154. PubMed ID: 28284440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A call for more science in forensic science.
    Bell S; Sah S; Albright TD; Gates SJ; Denton MB; Casadevall A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(18):4541-4544. PubMed ID: 29650539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communicating science in social settings.
    Scheufele DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14040-7. PubMed ID: 23940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attorney beliefs concerning scientific evidence and expert witness credibility.
    Wechsler HJ; Kehn A; Wise RA; Cramer RJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 41():58-66. PubMed ID: 25869850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions.
    O'Brien É; Nic Daeid N; Black S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The scientific reinvention of forensic science.
    Koehler JJ; Mnookin JL; Saks MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301840120. PubMed ID: 37782789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning in practice for becoming a professional forensic expert.
    Köpsén S; Nyström S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):208-15. PubMed ID: 22727266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The undergraduate program in forensic science: a national challenge].
    García Castillo Z; Graue Wiechers E; Durante Montiel I; Herrera Saint Leu P
    Gac Med Mex; 2014; 150(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 24481439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The logical foundations of forensic science: towards reliable knowledge.
    Evett I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2015 Aug; 370(1674):. PubMed ID: 26101288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Griffiths Question Map: A Forensic Tool For Expert Witnesses' Assessments of Witnesses and Victims' Statements.
    Dodier O; Denault V
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):266-274. PubMed ID: 28240349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal aids: Science primers in the courtroom.
    Baltimore D; Tatel DS
    Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):313. PubMed ID: 27127814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding scientists' communication challenges at the intersection of climate and agriculture.
    Getson JM; Church SP; Radulski BG; Sjöstrand AE; Lu J; Prokopy LS
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0269927. PubMed ID: 35917369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.