These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34369747)

  • 1. What Can Utilities Expect from New Lead Fifth-Liter Sampling Based on Historic First-Draw Data?
    Masters SV; Bradley TC; Burlingame GA; Seidel CJ; Schmelling M; Bartrand TA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Sep; 55(17):11491-11500. PubMed ID: 34369747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring the aftermath of Flint drinking water contamination crisis: Another case of sampling bias?
    Goovaerts P
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jul; 590-591():139-153. PubMed ID: 28259435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Lead in Drinking Water from Multiple Drinking Water Sampling Programs for a Midsize City.
    Vijayashanthar V; Small MJ; VanBriesen JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Jan; 57(1):842-851. PubMed ID: 36563039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The drinking water contamination crisis in Flint: Modeling temporal trends of lead level since returning to Detroit water system.
    Goovaerts P
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Mar; 581-582():66-79. PubMed ID: 27720257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequential drinking water sampling as a tool for evaluating lead in flint, Michigan.
    Lytle DA; Schock MR; Wait K; Cahalan K; Bosscher V; Porter A; Del Toral M
    Water Res; 2019 Jun; 157():40-54. PubMed ID: 30952007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating Water Lead Levels During the Flint Water Crisis.
    Pieper KJ; Martin R; Tang M; Walters L; Parks J; Roy S; Devine C; Edwards MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Aug; 52(15):8124-8132. PubMed ID: 29932326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatiotemporal trends of recovery from lead contamination in Flint, MI as revealed by crowdsourced water sampling.
    Abokifa AA; Katz L; Sela L
    Water Res; 2020 Mar; 171():115442. PubMed ID: 31927093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sampling in schools and large institutional buildings: Implications for regulations, exposure and management of lead and copper.
    Doré E; Deshommes E; Andrews RC; Nour S; Prévost M
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():110-122. PubMed ID: 29704756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low contribution of PbO2-coated lead service lines to water lead contamination at the tap.
    Triantafyllidou S; Schock MR; DeSantis MK; White C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 49(6):3746-54. PubMed ID: 25692317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of the long-term impacts of treatments on lead release from full and partially replaced harvested lead service lines.
    Doré E; Deshommes E; Laroche L; Nour S; Prévost M
    Water Res; 2019 Feb; 149():566-577. PubMed ID: 30508757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distribution system water age can create premise plumbing corrosion hotspots.
    Masters S; Parks J; Atassi A; Edwards MA
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Sep; 187(9):559. PubMed ID: 26251058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Effects of Full and Partial Lead Service Line Replacement on Lead Levels in Drinking Water.
    Trueman BF; Camara E; Gagnon GA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(14):7389-96. PubMed ID: 27337040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of sampling approach and daily water usage on lead levels measured at the tap.
    Lytle DA; Formal C; Cahalan K; Muhlen C; Triantafyllidou S
    Water Res; 2021 Jun; 197():117071. PubMed ID: 33799082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeled Impacts of Drinking Water Pb Reduction Scenarios on Children's Exposures and Blood Lead Levels.
    Stanek LW; Xue J; Lay CR; Helm EC; Schock M; Lytle DA; Speth TF; Zartarian VG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Aug; 54(15):9474-9482. PubMed ID: 32638591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of pipeline geometry, sample volume, and flow rate on pb monitoring outcomes in copper pipe drinking water supply systems.
    Chang L
    Water Res; 2022 Aug; 222():118890. PubMed ID: 35933812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing early warning systems to predict water lead levels in tap water for private systems.
    Khaksar Fasaee MA; Pesantez J; Pieper KJ; Ling E; Benham B; Edwards M; Berglund E
    Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118787. PubMed ID: 35841794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How geostatistics can help you find lead and galvanized water service lines: The case of Flint, MI.
    Goovaerts P
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 599-600():1552-1563. PubMed ID: 28531962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid and simple lead service line detection screening protocol using water sampling.
    Schock MR; Lytle DA; James RR; Lal V; Tang M
    AWWA Water Sci; 2021 Oct; 3(5):1-1255. PubMed ID: 34938981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water lead exposure risk in Flint, Michigan after switchback in water source: Implications for lead service line replacement policy.
    Zahran S; Mushinski D; McElmurry SP; Keyes C
    Environ Res; 2020 Feb; 181():108928. PubMed ID: 31787215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Compliance Data to Understand Uncertainty in Drinking Water Lead Levels in Southwestern Pennsylvania.
    Schwetschenau SE; Small MJ; Vanbriesen JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Jul; 54(14):8857-8867. PubMed ID: 32579849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.