189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34370074)
1. The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system.
Canzi P; Magnetto M; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Aprile F; Lafe E; Carlotto E; Avato I; Scribante A; Preda L; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 279(6):2889-2898. PubMed ID: 34370074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI-induced artifact by a cochlear implant with a novel magnet system: an experimental cadaver study.
Canzi P; Aprile F; Simoncelli A; Manfrin M; Magnetto M; Lafe E; Minervini D; Avato I; Terrani S; Scribante A; Gazibegovic D; Benazzo M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3753-3762. PubMed ID: 33206227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MRI Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 3 T In Vivo.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Mittmann P; Wagner J; Mutze S; Ernst A
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):972-6. PubMed ID: 25634466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging.
Berry JM; Tansey JB; Wu L; Choudhri A; Yawn RJ; MacDonald CB; Richard C
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):204-214. PubMed ID: 38260952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size.
Todt I; Guerkov R; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():5086291. PubMed ID: 32420348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image Quality and Artifact Reduction of a Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Magnets.
Winchester A; Kay-Rivest E; Bruno M; Hagiwara M; Moonis G; Jethanamest D
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e223-e229. PubMed ID: 36806625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First MRI With New Cochlear Implant With Rotatable Internal Magnet System and Proposal for Standardization of Reporting Magnet-Related Artifact Size.
Cass ND; Honce JM; O'Dell AL; Gubbels SP
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):883-891. PubMed ID: 31219967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Significant Artifact Reduction at 1.5T and 3T MRI by the Use of a Cochlear Implant with Removable Magnet: An Experimental Human Cadaver Study.
Wagner F; Wimmer W; Leidolt L; Vischer M; Weder S; Wiest R; Mantokoudis G; Caversaccio MD
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132483. PubMed ID: 26200775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifacts and Cochlear Implant Positioning at 1.5 T In Vivo.
Schröder D; Grupe G; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Ernst A; Seidl R; Mittmann P
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():9163285. PubMed ID: 30533442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Receiver Position and Its Temporal Changes.
Grupe G; Rademacher G; Hofmann S; Stratmann A; Mittmann P; Mutze S; Ernst A; Todt I
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e558-e562. PubMed ID: 29135877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on pain.
Todt I; Rademacher G; Grupe G; Stratmann A; Ernst A; Mutze S; Mittmann P
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(1):11. PubMed ID: 29402322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of head position on cochlear implant MRI artifact.
Ay N; Gehl HB; Sudhoff H; Todt I
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Aug; 278(8):2763-2767. PubMed ID: 32909061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Customized Cochlear Implant Positioning in a Patient With a Low- Grade Glioma: Towards the Best MRI Artifact Management.
Canzi P; Luzzi S; Carlotto E; Simoncelli A; Brondino N; Marconi S; Magnetto M; Lucifero GA; Avato I; Manfrin M; Auricchio F; Preda L; Benazzo M
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jul; 43(6):e628-e634. PubMed ID: 35709416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cranial MRI in a young child with cochlear implants after bilateral magnet removal.
Helbig S; Stöver T; Burck I; Kramer S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():1-4. PubMed ID: 29224745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR Imaging and Cochlear Implants with Retained Internal Magnets: Reducing Artifacts near Highly Inhomogeneous Magnetic Fields.
Edmonson HA; Carlson ML; Patton AC; Watson RE
Radiographics; 2018; 38(1):94-106. PubMed ID: 29320320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.
Tysome JR; Tam YC; Patterson I; Graves MJ; Gazibegovic D
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Dec; 40(10):e966-e974. PubMed ID: 31524762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implant with a non-removable magnet: preliminary research at 3-T MRI.
Dubrulle F; Sufana Iancu A; Vincent C; Tourrel G; Ernst O
Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1510-8. PubMed ID: 23300043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization of SEMAC-VAT MRI for Improved Visualization of Posterior Fossa Structures in Patients With Cochlear Implants.
Amin N; Pai I; Touska P; Connor SEJ
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Apr; 42(4):e451-e458. PubMed ID: 33534384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parametric Assessment of the Effect of Cochlear Implant Positioning on Brain MRI Artefacts at 3 T.
Dewey RS; Dineen RA; Clemence M; Dick O; Bowtell R; Kitterick PT
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10):e1449-e1456. PubMed ID: 34267098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artifacts caused by cochlear implants with non-removable magnets in 3T MRI: phantom and cadaveric studies.
Majdani O; Rau TS; Götz F; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R; Leinung M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 266(12):1885-90. PubMed ID: 19629509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
