215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34370279)
1. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advancing mid-rectal cancer surgery: Unveiling the potential of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in comparison to conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection.
Muhammad S; Jiang Z; Fan T; Tang Q; Hai Y; Ehsan SBE; Bilal M; Zubayraeva AA; Gao Y; He J
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2024 May; 7(5):e2003. PubMed ID: 38703000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
Xu S; Zhang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study.
Chang SC; Chen HC; Chen YC; Ke TW; Tsai YY; Wang HM; Fingerhut A; Chen WT
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Aug; 63(8):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 32692072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.
Tang Q; Zhu Y; Xiong H; Sheng X; Hu Z; Hu H; Huang R; Zhang Q; Yuan Z; Xie L; Gao Z; Wang Y; Wang G; Wang X
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():2247-2257. PubMed ID: 33727861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term oncologic outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment of rectal cancer: a propensity-score matching study.
Li Z; Xiong H; Qiao T; Jiao S; Zhu Y; Wang G; Wang X; Tang Q
BMC Surg; 2022 Jul; 22(1):286. PubMed ID: 35879754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Xu SZ; Wang ZF; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SB; Yan F; Liu GY; Cai JC
Int J Surg; 2024 Mar; 110(3):1402-1410. PubMed ID: 38484259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.
Houqiong J; Ziwen W; Chonghan Z; Penghui H; Hongxin Y; Weijie L; Dongning L; Taiyuan L
Front Surg; 2023; 10():1092128. PubMed ID: 36874472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-Term Outcome Comparison Between Two Specimen Extraction Approaches for Middle Rectum Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Zhong Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Jin Y; Wang Y; Tang Q; Huang R; Wang G; Wang X
Surg Innov; 2021 Dec; 28(6):738-746. PubMed ID: 33787417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Propensity score matching-based analysis of short-term outcomes of Laparoscopic-assisted Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for left colorectal cancer radical resection].
Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Qiu XF; Yan F; Yuan SS; Cai JC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 May; 96(20):1578-81. PubMed ID: 27266686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short- and long-term outcomes as well as anal function of transanal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer resection: a retrospective study with over 5-year follow-up.
Zhang J; Li W; Li Y; Amin B; Zhang N; Sun Z; Zhu B
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2022 Jun; 17(2):344-351. PubMed ID: 35707343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled study].
Chen ZZ; Ding ZJ; Wang ZF; Xu SZ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 26(8):768-772. PubMed ID: 37574293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and traditional laparoscopic low anterior resection for middle and low rectal cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.
Feng Q; Ng SSM; Zhang Z; Lin S; Niu Z; Wei Y; He G; Chang W; Zhu D; Xu J
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 124(4):607-618. PubMed ID: 34076898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of short-term efficacy analysis of medium-rectal cancer surgery with robotic natural orifice specimen extraction and robotic transabdominal specimen extraction.
Ye SP; Lu WJ; Liu DN; Yu HX; Wu C; Xu HC; Li TY
BMC Surg; 2023 Nov; 23(1):336. PubMed ID: 37940918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Specimen extraction through natural orifices with Cai tubes in gastrointestinal surgery: a single-institute series of 234 cases].
Zhuang YF; Xu SZ; Wang ZF; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yan F; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Apr; 26(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 37072313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery for early-stage rectal cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis (in China).
Liu D; He G; Yao H; Guan X; Wang G; Xiong D; Hu J; Yuan W; Yang C; He P; Ye S; Ju H; Yu H; Niu Z; Liu K; Tang Q; Huang R; Lian Y; Guan S; Jian J; Wei Y; Wang X; Li T
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38914889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional robotic colorectal cancer resection: a propensity score matching study.
Huang Y; Yu N
J Robot Surg; 2024 Apr; 18(1):175. PubMed ID: 38619667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection in the treatment effects of low rectal cancer.
Zhu Y; Xiong H; Chen Y; Liu Z; Jiang Z; Huang R; Gao F; Zhang Q; Wang M; Jin Y; Qiao T; Ma T; Hu H; Wang X; Tang Q; Wang G
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):9338. PubMed ID: 33927293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
