These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34370495)

  • 1. Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):949-975. PubMed ID: 34370495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105441. PubMed ID: 37058827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the twain can meet: Prospect theory and models of heuristics in risky choice.
    Pachur T; Suter RS; Hertwig R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Mar; 93():44-73. PubMed ID: 28189037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention.
    Pachur T; Schulte-Mecklenbeck M; Murphy RO; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Feb; 147(2):147-169. PubMed ID: 29369680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stronger attentional biases can be linked to higher reward rate in preferential choice.
    Zilker V
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105095. PubMed ID: 35468359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for the last-sampling bias in perceptual decision-making.
    Zhu T
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():105049. PubMed ID: 35131576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions.
    Yang X; Krajbich I
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):52-70. PubMed ID: 35025570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The composition of the choice set modulates probability weighting in risky decisions.
    Grubb MA; Li Y; Larisch R; Hartmann J; Gottlieb J; Levy I
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 23(3):666-677. PubMed ID: 36702993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Music-evoked incidental happiness modulates probability weighting during risky lottery choices.
    Schulreich S; Heussen YG; Gerhardt H; Mohr PN; Binkofski FC; Koelsch S; Heekeren HR
    Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():981. PubMed ID: 24432007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risky choice: Probability weighting explains independence axiom violations in monkeys.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Seak LCU; Schultz W
    J Risk Uncertain; 2022; 65(3):319-351. PubMed ID: 36654986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Attentional Drift Diffusion Model of Simple Perceptual Decision-Making.
    Tavares G; Perona P; Rangel A
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():468. PubMed ID: 28894413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional Selection Mediates Framing and Risk-Bias Effects.
    Glickman M; Tsetsos K; Usher M
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Dec; 29(12):2010-2019. PubMed ID: 30403368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainty plus prior equals rational bias: an intuitive Bayesian probability weighting function.
    Fennell J; Baddeley R
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Oct; 119(4):878-87. PubMed ID: 22800412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The construct-behavior gap and the description-experience gap: Comment on Regenwetter and Robinson (2017).
    Hertwig R; Pleskac TJ
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):844-849. PubMed ID: 30299143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social Distance Reduces the Biases of Overweighting Small Probabilities and Underweighting Large Probabilities.
    Sun Q; Lu J; Zhang H; Liu Y
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1309-1324. PubMed ID: 33331239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.
    Ferro GM; Sornette D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243661. PubMed ID: 33315897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reversed description-experience gap: Disentangling sources of presentation format effects in risky choice.
    Glöckner A; Hilbig BE; Henninger F; Fiedler S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Apr; 145(4):486-508. PubMed ID: 26974209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions.
    Krajbich I; Lu D; Camerer C; Rangel A
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():193. PubMed ID: 22707945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.