These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34371673)
1. A Non-Invasive Approach in the Assessment of Stress Phenomena and Impairment Values in Pea Seeds Caused by Pea Weevil. Keszthelyi S; Fajtai D; Pónya Z; Somfalvi-Tóth K; Donkó T Plants (Basel); 2021 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34371673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pea weevil damage and chemical characteristics of pea cultivars determining their resistance to Bruchus pisorum L. Nikolova I Bull Entomol Res; 2016 Apr; 106(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 26837535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing Neoplasm Expression in Field Pea (Pisum sativum) via Intercropping and Its Significance to Pea Weevil (Bruchus pisorum) Management. Teshome A; Bryngelsson T; Mendesil E; Marttila S; Geleta M Front Plant Sci; 2016; 7():654. PubMed ID: 27242855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bean [alpha]-Amylase Inhibitor Confers Resistance to the Pea Weevil (Bruchus pisorum) in Transgenic Peas (Pisum sativum L.). Schroeder HE; Gollasch S; Moore A; Tabe LM; Craig S; Hardie DC; Chrispeels MJ; Spencer D; Higgins T Plant Physiol; 1995 Apr; 107(4):1233-1239. PubMed ID: 12228429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Response of Pea Varieties to Damage Degree of Pea Weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. Nikolova IM Scientifica (Cairo); 2016; 2016():8053860. PubMed ID: 27042379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oviposition Preference of Pea Weevil, Bruchus pisorum L. Among Host and Non-host Plants and its Implication for Pest Management. Mendesil E; Rämert B; Marttila S; Hillbur Y; Anderson P Front Plant Sci; 2015; 6():1186. PubMed ID: 26779220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response to water deficit and high temperature of transgenic peas (Pisum sativum L.) containing a seed-specific alpha-amylase inhibitor and the subsequent effects on pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) survival. Sousa-Majer MJ; Turner NC; Hardie DC; Morton RL; Lamont B; Higgins TJ J Exp Bot; 2004 Feb; 55(396):497-505. PubMed ID: 14718496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flower and Pod Source Influence on Pea Weevil ( Aznar-Fernández T; Rubiales D Front Plant Sci; 2019; 10():491. PubMed ID: 31068956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bean alpha-amylase inhibitor 1 in transgenic peas (Pisum sativum) provides complete protection from pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum) under field conditions. Morton RL; Schroeder HE; Bateman KS; Chrispeels MJ; Armstrong E; Higgins TJ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 Apr; 97(8):3820-5. PubMed ID: 10759552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Response ofNp mutant of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L.) oviposition and extracts. Doss RP; Proebsting WM; Potter SW; Clement SL J Chem Ecol; 1995 Jan; 21(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 24233570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bean alpha-amylase inhibitors in transgenic peas inhibit development of pea weevil larvae. de Sousa-Majer MJ; Hardie DC; Turner NC; Higgins TJ J Econ Entomol; 2007 Aug; 100(4):1416-22. PubMed ID: 17849896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of damage caused by Gibicsár S; Donkó T; Fajtai D; Keszthelyi S Plant Direct; 2024 Oct; 8(10):e70015. PubMed ID: 39385759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of genome regions controlling cotyledon, pod wall/seed coat and pod wall resistance to pea weevil through QTL mapping. Aryamanesh N; Zeng Y; Byrne O; Hardie DC; Al-Subhi AM; Khan T; Siddique KH; Yan G Theor Appl Genet; 2013 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 24231921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Occupational airborne contact urticaria, anaphylaxis and asthma in farmers and agronomists due to Bruchus pisorum. Armentia A; Alvarez R; Moreno-González V; Martín B; Fernández S; Martín S; Moro A; Vega JM; Barrios A; Castillo M; Pineda F Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Dec; 83(6):466-474. PubMed ID: 32592184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-invasive diagnosis of viability in seeds and lichens by infrared thermography under controlled environmental conditions. Fernández-Marín B; Buchner O; Kastberger G; Piombino F; García-Plazaola JI; Kranner I Plant Methods; 2019; 15():147. PubMed ID: 31827579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insect Pests of Pulse Crops and their Management in Neolithic Europe. Antolín F; Schäfer M Environ Archaeol; 2024; 29(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 38230265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Semiochemical-Baited Traps for Monitoring the Pea Leaf Weevil, Sitona lineatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Field Pea Crops. St Onge A; Cárcamo HA; Evenden ML Environ Entomol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 29186376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bruchins: insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. Doss RP; Oliver JE; Proebsting WM; Potter SW; Kuy S; Clement SL; Williamson RT; Carney JR; DeVilbiss ED Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2000 May; 97(11):6218-23. PubMed ID: 10811915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GIS-Based Tool for Pest Specific Area-Wide Planning of Crop Rotation Distance with Land Use Data. Schieler M; Riemer N; Racca P; Kleinhenz B; Saucke H; Veith M; Meese B Insects; 2024 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 38667379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First Report of Phoma herbarum on Field Pea (Pisum sativum) in Australia. Li YP; You MP; Khan TN; Finnegan PM; Barbetti MJ Plant Dis; 2011 Dec; 95(12):1590. PubMed ID: 30731989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]