172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34371861)
1. A Method to Estimate the Efficacy vs. Effectiveness in Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials with Different Adherence Scenarios: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study in Nutrition.
López-Espinoza MÁ; Lozano-Lozano JA; Prieto-Merino D
Nutrients; 2021 Jul; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 34371861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Per-Protocol analyses produced larger treatment effect sizes than intention to treat: a meta-epidemiological study.
Mostazir M; Taylor G; Henley WE; Watkins ER; Taylor RS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Oct; 138():12-21. PubMed ID: 34161805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary school interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Delgado-Noguera M; Tort S; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Bonfill X
Prev Med; 2011; 53(1-2):3-9. PubMed ID: 21601591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating treatment effects in randomised controlled trials with non-compliance: a simulation study.
Ye C; Beyene J; Browne G; Thabane L
BMJ Open; 2014 Jun; 4(6):e005362. PubMed ID: 24939814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives.
Beckett RD; Loeser KC; Bowman KR; Towne TG
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):106. PubMed ID: 27557676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing efficacy in non-inferiority trials with non-adherence to interventions: Are intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses fit for purpose?
Dodd M; Carpenter J; Thompson JA; Williamson E; Fielding K; Elbourne D
Stat Med; 2024 May; 43(12):2314-2331. PubMed ID: 38561927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond intention to treat: what is the right question?
Shrier I; Steele RJ; Verhagen E; Herbert R; Riddell CA; Kaufman JS
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 24096636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intention-to-treat versus as-treated versus per-protocol approaches to analysis.
Ahn E; Kang H
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2023 Dec; 76(6):531-539. PubMed ID: 38031328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dichotomizing partial compliance and increased participant burden in factorial designs: the performance of four noncompliance methods.
Merrill PD; McClure LA
Trials; 2015 Nov; 16():523. PubMed ID: 26573840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat.
Matilde Sanchez M; Chen X
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intention-to-treat analysis may be more conservative than per protocol analysis in antibiotic non-inferiority trials: a systematic review.
Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D;
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 33874894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intention-to-treat analyses in behavioral medicine randomized clinical trials.
Pagoto SL; Kozak AT; John P; Bodenlos JS; Hedeker D; Spring B; Schneider KL
Int J Behav Med; 2009; 16(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 19319693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intention to treat and per protocol analysis in clinical trials.
Tripepi G; Chesnaye NC; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Jul; 25(7):513-517. PubMed ID: 32147926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adjustment for compliance behavior in trials of epidural analgesia in labor using instrumental variable meta-analysis.
Bannister-Tyrrell M; Miladinovic B; Roberts CL; Ford JB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 25592169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correcting for non-compliance in randomized non-inferiority trials with active and placebo control using structural models.
Wu Y; Zhao L; Hou Y; Li K; Zhou X
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):950-65. PubMed ID: 25534903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interval estimation of the risk difference in non-compliance randomized trials with repeated binary measurements.
Lui KJ
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3140-56. PubMed ID: 17177272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On carrots and curiosity: eating fruit and vegetables is associated with greater flourishing in daily life.
Conner TS; Brookie KL; Richardson AC; Polak MA
Br J Health Psychol; 2015 May; 20(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 25080035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using a correction factor to correct for overreporting in a food-frequency questionnaire does not improve biomarker-assessed validity of estimates for fruit and vegetable consumption.
Bogers RP; Dagnelie PC; Westerterp KR; Kester AD; van Klaveren JD; Bast A; van den Brandt PA
J Nutr; 2003 Apr; 133(4):1213-9. PubMed ID: 12672945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fill "half your child's plate with fruits and vegetables": Correlations with food-related practices and the home food environment.
Arcan C; Friend S; Flattum CF; Story M; Fulkerson JA
Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():77-82. PubMed ID: 30339784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reporting of intention-to-treat analyses in recent analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations.
Gewandter JS; McDermott MP; McKeown A; Smith SM; Pawlowski JR; Poli JJ; Rothstein D; Williams MR; Bujanover S; Farrar JT; Gilron I; Katz NP; Rowbotham MC; Turk DC; Dworkin RH
Pain; 2014 Dec; 155(12):2714-2719. PubMed ID: 25284072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
