These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34371861)

  • 21. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study.
    Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A
    BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adjusting for bias in unblinded randomized controlled trials.
    Schmidt AF; Groenwold R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 27932664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis as reported in orthodontic randomized controlled trials-evaluations of methodology and recommendations for the accurate use of ITT analysis and handling dropouts.
    Bondemark L; Abdulraheem S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):409-413. PubMed ID: 29069355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A family-based intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescents: a pilot study.
    Pearson N; Atkin AJ; Biddle SJ; Gorely T
    Public Health Nutr; 2010 Jun; 13(6):876-85. PubMed ID: 20196908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of the intention-to-treat principle in nursing clinical trials.
    Polit DF; Gillespie BM
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 19918150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A systematic review found that deviations from intention-to-treat are common in randomized trials and systematic reviews.
    Abraha I; Cozzolino F; Orso M; Marchesi M; Germani A; Lombardo G; Eusebi P; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Iorio A; Montedori A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():37-46. PubMed ID: 28088592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health effects of mixed fruit and vegetable concentrates: a systematic review of the clinical interventions.
    Esfahani A; Wong JM; Truan J; Villa CR; Mirrahimi A; Srichaikul K; Kendall CW
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2011 Oct; 30(5):285-94. PubMed ID: 22081614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Environmental and personal correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption in low income, urban Mexican children.
    Pérez-Lizaur AB; Kaufer-Horwitz M; Plazas M
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2008 Feb; 21(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 18184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment crossovers in time-to-event non-inferiority randomised trials of radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
    Parpia S; Julian JA; Thabane L; Gu C; Whelan TJ; Levine MN
    BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e006531. PubMed ID: 25344487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Incorporating healthy dietary changes in addition to an increase in fruit and vegetable intake further improves the status of cardiovascular disease risk factors: A systematic review, meta-regression, and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Toh DWK; Koh ES; Kim JE
    Nutr Rev; 2020 Jul; 78(7):532-545. PubMed ID: 31889199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intention to treat and per protocol analyses: differences and similarities.
    Molero-Calafell J; Burón A; Castells X; Porta M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jul; ():111457. PubMed ID: 38977160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nonadherence to treatment protocol in published randomised controlled trials: a review.
    Dodd S; White IR; Williamson P
    Trials; 2012 Jun; 13():84. PubMed ID: 22709676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analyzing phase III studies in hospice/palliative care. a solution that sits between intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses: the palliative-modified ITT analysis.
    Currow DC; Plummer JL; Kutner JS; Samsa GP; Abernethy AP
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Oct; 44(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 22819439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can knowledge alone predict vegetable and fruit consumption among adolescents? A transtheoretical model perspective.
    El Hamid Hussein RA
    J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 2011; 86(5-6):95-103. PubMed ID: 22173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intention-to-treat analysis: Are we managing dropouts and missing data properly in research on orthodontic treatment? A systematic review.
    Barretto Dos Santos Lopes Batista K; Thiruvenkatachari B; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):19-27.e3. PubMed ID: 30591159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Augmenting fruit and vegetable consumption by an online intervention: Psychological mechanisms.
    Keller J; Motter S; Motter M; Schwarzer R
    Appetite; 2018 Jan; 120():348-355. PubMed ID: 28943477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sensitivity analysis of intention-to-treat estimates when withdrawals are related to unobserved compliance status.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Griffiths K
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1164-79. PubMed ID: 17724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reporting non-adherence in cluster randomised trials: A systematic review.
    Agbla SC; DiazOrdaz K
    Clin Trials; 2018 Jun; 15(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 29608096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Understanding the Intention-to-treat Principle in Randomized Controlled Trials.
    McCoy CE
    West J Emerg Med; 2017 Oct; 18(6):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 29085540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.