171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34373188)
1. Multiple direction needle-path planning and inverse dose optimization for robotic low-dose rate brachytherapy.
Aumüller P; Rothfuss A; Polednik M; Abo-Madyan Y; Ehmann M; Giordano FA; Clausen S
Z Med Phys; 2022 May; 32(2):173-187. PubMed ID: 34373188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust stochastic optimization of needle configurations for robotic HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Gerlach S; Siebert FA; Schlaefer A
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):464-475. PubMed ID: 37897883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Embedding expertise knowledge into inverse treatment planning for low-dose-rate brachytherapy of hepatic malignancies.
Zhu J; Wang C; Teng S; Lu J; Lyu P; Zhang P; Xu J; Lu L; Teng GJ
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):348-362. PubMed ID: 37475484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An open-source genetic algorithm for determining optimal seed distributions for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
McGeachy P; Madamesila J; Beauchamp A; Khan R
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 26023047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison between treatment plans of patients treated with low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate interstitial prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Initial findings of a randomized clinical trial.
Major T; Polgár C; Jorgo K; Stelczer G; Ágoston P
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28325472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame.
Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous needle catheter selection and dwell time optimization for preplanning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Wang C; Gonzalez Y; Shen C; Hrycushko B; Jia X
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(5):055028. PubMed ID: 33264753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Demonstration of simulated annealing optimization for permanent breast seed implant treatment planning.
Roumeliotis M; Yates B; Watt E; Frederick A; Meyer T
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):615-620. PubMed ID: 29396035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A fast inverse treatment planning strategy facilitating optimized catheter selection in image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.
Guthier CV; Damato AL; Hesser JW; Viswanathan AN; Cormack RA
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6117-6127. PubMed ID: 28921538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.
Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of clinical benefits achievable by using different optimization algorithms during real-time prostate brachytherapy.
Adamczyk M; Zwierzchowski G; Malicki J; Skowronek J
Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 22221470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the MIM Symphony treatment planning system for low-dose-rate- prostate brachytherapy.
Dhanesar SK; Lim TY; Du W; Bruno TL; Frank SJ; Kudchadker RJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):62–75. PubMed ID: 26699290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a Machine-Learning Algorithm for Treatment Planning in Prostate Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy.
Nicolae A; Morton G; Chung H; Loblaw A; Jain S; Mitchell D; Lu L; Helou J; Al-Hanaqta M; Heath E; Ravi A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(4):822-829. PubMed ID: 28244419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
