These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34374029)

  • 21. The impact of facial attractiveness and alleged personality traits on fairness decisions in the ultimatum game: Evidence from ERPs.
    Li T; Liang Z; Yuan Y; Sommer W; Li W
    Biol Psychol; 2024 Jul; 190():108809. PubMed ID: 38718883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beauty affects fairness: facial attractiveness alters neural responses to unfairness in the ultimatum game.
    Pan Y; Jin J; Wan Y; Wu Y; Wang F; Xu S; Zhu L; Xu J; Rao H
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Dec; 16(6):2497-2505. PubMed ID: 35821158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game.
    Ichinose G; Sayama H
    Sci Rep; 2014 May; 4():5104. PubMed ID: 24869922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wei C; Zheng L; Che L; Cheng X; Li L; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():182. PubMed ID: 29515497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Agency matters! Social preferences in the three-person ultimatum game.
    Alexopoulos J; Pfabigan DM; Göschl F; Bauer H; Fischmeister FP
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():312. PubMed ID: 23818878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.
    Halali E; Bereby-Meyer Y; Ockenfels A
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():240. PubMed ID: 23781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Social preferences trump emotions in human responses to unfair offers.
    Buskens V; Kovacic I; Rutterkamp E; van de Rijt A; Terburg D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9602. PubMed ID: 37311882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abnormal emotion processing, but intact fairness and intentionality considerations during social decision-making in schizophrenia.
    de la Asuncion J; Docx L; Sabbe B; Morrens M; de Bruijn ER
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1058. PubMed ID: 26257699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining.
    Weiland S; Hewig J; Hecht H; Mussel P; Miltner WH
    Soc Neurosci; 2012; 7(5):537-51. PubMed ID: 22443447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Same allocation proposed by an individual or a group elicits distinct responses: Evidence from event-related potentials and neural oscillation.
    Chen P; Liu S; Zhang Y; Qin S; Mai X
    Neuroimage; 2024 Apr; 290():120565. PubMed ID: 38453102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Beauty matters: social preferences in a three-person ultimatum game.
    Ma Q; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125806. PubMed ID: 25951138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deliberate or unintended: Intentions modulate empathic responses to others' economic payoffs in social interactions.
    Ma Q; Meng L; Shen Q
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):637-648. PubMed ID: 27549133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.
    Xu Q; Hu J; Qin Y; Li G; Zhang X; Li P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Apr; 44(6):2451-2464. PubMed ID: 36749642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ranking status differentially affects rejection sensitivity in adolescence: An event-related potential study.
    Zanolie K; Crone EA
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Nov; 162():108020. PubMed ID: 34506804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The semiotics of the message and the messenger: How nonverbal communication affects fairness perception.
    Spapé M; Harjunen V; Ahmed I; Jacucci G; Ravaja N
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 19(5):1259-1272. PubMed ID: 31290016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.
    Wang Y; Zhang Z; Bai L; Lin C; Osinsky R; Hewig J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39827. PubMed ID: 28051156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.