These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34374353)

  • 41. Specimen Temperature Detection on a Clinical Laboratory Pre-Analytic Automation Track: Implications for Direct-from-Track Total Laboratory Automation (TLA) Systems.
    Roundy CS; Lin DC; Klopping PJ; Ence AT; Krezel AC; Genzen JR
    SLAS Technol; 2020 Jun; 25(3):293-299. PubMed ID: 31592702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Performance of Kiestra total laboratory automation combined with MS in clinical microbiology practice.
    Mutters NT; Hodiamont CJ; de Jong MD; Overmeijer HP; van den Boogaard M; Visser CE
    Ann Lab Med; 2014 Mar; 34(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 24624346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Conversion of a classical microbiology laboratory to a total automation laboratory enhanced by the application of lean principles.
    Trigueiro G; Oliveira C; Rodrigues A; Seabra S; Pinto R; Bala Y; Gutiérrez Granado M; Vallejo S; Gonzalez V; Cardoso C
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Feb; 12(2):e0215323. PubMed ID: 38230933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.
    Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Impact of Total Automaton on the Clinical Laboratory Workforce: A Case Study.
    Al Naam YA; Elsafi S; Al Jahdali MH; Al Shaman RS; Al-Qurouni BH; Al Zahrani EM
    J Healthc Leadersh; 2022; 14():55-62. PubMed ID: 35586661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Total Laboratory Automation: What Is Gained, What Is Lost, and Who Can Afford It?
    Thomson RB; McElvania E
    Clin Lab Med; 2019 Sep; 39(3):371-389. PubMed ID: 31383263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Virtual automation.
    Casis E; Garrido A; Uranga B; Vives A; Zufiaurre C
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(2):89-91. PubMed ID: 11299911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dedicated Perioperative Hip Fracture Comanagement Programs are Cost-effective in High-volume Centers: An Economic Analysis.
    Swart E; Vasudeva E; Makhni EC; Macaulay W; Bozic KJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 26260393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [My Kumamoto life of 19 years].
    Okabe H
    Rinsho Byori; 2005 Dec; 53(12):1164-78. PubMed ID: 16447689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Economic evaluation comparing intraoperative cone beam CT-based navigation and conventional fluoroscopy for the placement of spinal pedicle screws: a patient-level data cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Dea N; Fisher CG; Batke J; Strelzow J; Mendelsohn D; Paquette SJ; Kwon BK; Boyd MD; Dvorak MF; Street JT
    Spine J; 2016 Jan; 16(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 26456854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Significant Operational Improvements with Implementation of Next Generation Laboratory Automation.
    Tanasijevic MJ; Melanson SEF; Tolan NV; Ransohoff JR; Conrad MJ; Paik HI; Petrides AK
    Lab Med; 2021 Jul; 52(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 33438745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The optimization of total laboratory automation by simulation of a pull-strategy.
    Yang T; Wang TK; Li VC; Su CL
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jan; 39(1):162. PubMed ID: 25472727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Automation in the 21st Century - Amat Victoria curam (Victory loves careful preparation).
    Armbruster DA; Overcash DR; Reyes J
    Clin Biochem Rev; 2014 Aug; 35(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 25336760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Anaerobes and laboratory automation: Like oil and water?
    Gajdács M
    Anaerobe; 2019 Oct; 59():112-114. PubMed ID: 31228670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center.
    Tsai WW; Nash DB; Seamonds B; Weir GJ
    Clin Ther; 1994; 16(5):898-910; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 7859247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Weekly laboratory turn-around time identifies poor performance masked by aggregated reporting.
    Coetzee LM; Cassim N; Glencross DK
    Afr J Lab Med; 2020; 9(1):1102. PubMed ID: 33392052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Does bacteriology laboratory automation reduce time to results and increase quality management?
    Dauwalder O; Landrieve L; Laurent F; de Montclos M; Vandenesch F; Lina G
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2016 Mar; 22(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 26577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Laboratory automation: trajectory, technology, and tactics.
    Markin RS; Whalen SA
    Clin Chem; 2000 May; 46(5):764-71. PubMed ID: 10794775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cost analysis in the toxicology laboratory.
    Travers EM
    Clin Lab Med; 1990 Sep; 10(3):591-623. PubMed ID: 2253452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Total Automation for the Core Laboratory: Improving the Turnaround Time Helps to Reduce the Volume of Ordered STAT Tests.
    Ialongo C; Porzio O; Giambini I; Bernardini S
    J Lab Autom; 2016 Jun; 21(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 25882188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.