These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34374876)

  • 1. Proximity of mandibular third molar root(s) to surrounding cortical bone: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic findings.
    Wihokrut S; Vorakulpipat C; Manosuthi P; Waikakul A
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 26(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 34374876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Peker I; Sarikir C; Alkurt MT; Zor ZF
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 14():71. PubMed ID: 24928108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings.
    Tantanapornkul W; Okochi K; Bhakdinaronk A; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19114418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation.
    Patel PS; Shah JS; Dudhia BB; Butala PB; Jani YV; Macwan RS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 32246689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery.
    Hauge Matzen L; Christensen J; Hintze H; Schou S; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Nov; 71(6):1391-8. PubMed ID: 23356838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
    Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Panoramic Radiography vs. CBCT in the Evaluation of the Maxillary Third Molar Roots.
    Almeida-Marques M; Ingold MMS; da Silva-Junior AF; Franco A; Junqueira JLC; Oenning AC
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Nov; 59(11):. PubMed ID: 38004024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images.
    Kapila R; Harada N; Araki K; Sano T; Goto TK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 May; 117(5):640-644. PubMed ID: 24725991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cone-beam computed tomography classification of the mandibular second molar root morphology and its relationship to panoramic radiographic appearance.
    Funakoshi T; Shibata T; Inamoto K; Shibata N; Ariji Y; Fukuda M; Nakata K; Ariji E
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 33048311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Before Mandibular Third Molar Surgery Impact Treatment Planning?
    Baqain ZH; AlHadidi A; AbuKaraky A; Khader Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jul; 78(7):1071-1077. PubMed ID: 32277937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can CBCT change the level of confidence of oral maxillofacial surgeons in mandibular third molar management?
    Wanzeler AMV; Silveira HLDD; Buligon RP; Corsetti A; Vieira HT; Arús NA; Vizzotto MB
    Braz Oral Res; 2022; 36():e078. PubMed ID: 35703704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of a superimposed relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
    Jung YH; Nah KS; Cho BH
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Sep; 42(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 23071961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal.
    Neves FS; Souza TC; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ; Bóscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Oct; 41(7):553-7. PubMed ID: 22282507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography.
    Freire BB; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos KF; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Aug; 128(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 31072782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis.
    Deppe H; Ritschl LM; Kleinschmidt J; Wagenpfeil S; Sculean A
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(6):470-477. PubMed ID: 31086860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristic findings on panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT to predict paresthesia after extraction of impacted third molar.
    Harada N; Beloor Vasudeva S; Matsuda Y; Seki K; Kapila R; Ishikawa N; Okano T; Sano T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2015; 56(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25765570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT.
    Guerrero ME; Botetano R; Beltran J; Horner K; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):335-42. PubMed ID: 23494455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inferior alveolar nerve injury: Correlation between indicators of risk on panoramic radiographs and the incidence of tooth and mandibular canal contact on cone-beam computed tomography scans in a Western Australian population.
    Winstanley KL; Otway LM; Thompson L; Brook ZH; King N; Koong B; O'Halloran M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2018 Aug; 9(3):e12323. PubMed ID: 29399983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal bone loss in the second molar related to impacted mandibular third molars: comparison between panoramic images and cone beam computed tomography.
    Dias MJ; Franco A; Junqueira JL; Fayad FT; Pereira PH; Oenning AC
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e395-e402. PubMed ID: 32271319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency.
    Nascimento EHL; Oenning ACC; Freire BB; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):20170198. PubMed ID: 28871830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.