These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34374992)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of footwear evidence: Initial workflow for an end-to-end system.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Lund SP; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Nov; 66(6):2232-2251. PubMed ID: 34374992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of similarity between randomly acquired characteristics on high quality exemplars and crime scene impressions via analysis of feature size and shape.
    Richetelli N; Nobel M; Bodziak WJ; Speir JA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jan; 270():211-222. PubMed ID: 27838107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A database of two-dimensional images of footwear outsole impressions.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105508. PubMed ID: 32322634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part I - Impressions in blood.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):117-133. PubMed ID: 38182307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of forensic footwear examiner decisions.
    Austin Hicklin R; McVicker BC; Parks C; LeMay J; Richetelli N; Smith M; Buscaglia J; Perlman RS; Peters EM; Eckenrode BA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Oct; 339():111418. PubMed ID: 35987091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in a forensic footwear database.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 37169469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing footwear impressions that are close non-matches using correlation-based approaches.
    Venkatasubramanian G; Hegde V; Padi S; Iyer H; Herman M
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):890-909. PubMed ID: 33682930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical note: The Next Step - a semi-automatic coding and comparison system for forensic footwear impressions.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Pertsev R; Issan Y; Pasternak Z; Cohen A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Aug; 337():111378. PubMed ID: 35839684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dataset of Digitized RACs and Their Rarity Score Analysis for Strengthening Shoeprint Evidence.
    Wiesner S; Shor Y; Tsach T; Kaplan-Damary N; Yekutieli Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):762-774. PubMed ID: 31738459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulated crime scene footwear impression database for teaching and research purposes.
    Lin ET; DeBat T; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):726-734. PubMed ID: 34750820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimate of the random match frequency of acquired characteristics in footwear: Part II - Impressions in dust.
    Smale AN; Speir JA
    Sci Justice; 2024 Jan; 64(1):134-150. PubMed ID: 38182308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ShoeCase: A data set of mock crime scene footwear impressions.
    Tibben A; McGuire M; Renfro S; Carriquiry A
    Data Brief; 2023 Oct; 50():109546. PubMed ID: 37780466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of image descriptors on the performance of classifiers of footwear outsole image pairs.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Feb; 331():111126. PubMed ID: 34922283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Location distribution of randomly acquired characteristics on a shoe sole.
    Kaplan-Damary N; Mandel M; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Wiesner S
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Sep; 67(5):1801-1809. PubMed ID: 35855550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An algorithm to compare two-dimensional footwear outsole images using maximum cliques and speeded-up robust feature.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    Stat Anal Data Min; 2020 Apr; 13(2):188-199. PubMed ID: 32215164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisions.
    Richetelli N; LeMay J; Dunagan KM; Parks CL; Hicklin RA; Chapman WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112009. PubMed ID: 38581823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dependence among randomly acquired characteristics on shoeprints and their features.
    Kaplan Damary N; Mandel M; Wiesner S; Yekutieli Y; Shor Y; Spiegelman C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():173-179. PubMed ID: 29324348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inherent variation in multiple shoe-sole test impressions.
    Shor Y; Wiesner S; Tsach T; Gurel R; Yekutieli Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Apr; 285():189-203. PubMed ID: 29428777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novices cannot fill the examiners' shoes: Evidence of footwear examiners' expertise in shoe comparisons.
    Chapman R; Summersby S; Lang T; Raymond J; Ballantyne K
    Sci Justice; 2023 Sep; 63(5):598-611. PubMed ID: 37718007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic Footwear Reliability: Part II-Range of Conclusions, Accuracy, and Consensus.
    Richetelli N; Hammer L; Speir JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1871-1882. PubMed ID: 32940930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.