These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34374992)

  • 21. Recovery of 3D footwear impressions using a range of different techniques.
    Larsen HJ; Bennett MR
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1056-1064. PubMed ID: 33394502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Casting of 3-dimensional footwear prints in snow with foam blocks.
    Petraco N; Sherman H; Dumitra A; Roberts M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():147-151. PubMed ID: 27124876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Foreign object held in recessed areas of shoe outsole as an acquired characteristic in footwear examination: A preliminary study.
    Liu L; Wang W; Luo Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Nov; 304():109949. PubMed ID: 31568950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the quality of footwear marks recovered from simulated graves.
    Stephens M; Errickson D; Giles SB; Ringrose TJ
    Sci Justice; 2020 Nov; 60(6):512-521. PubMed ID: 33077034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantifying the similarity of 2D images using edge pixels: an application to the forensic comparison of footwear impressions.
    Park S; Carriquiry A
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(10):1833-1860. PubMed ID: 35706708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A new method for the recovery and evidential comparison of footwear impressions using 3D structured light scanning.
    Thompson TJU; Norris P
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):237-243. PubMed ID: 29685306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-dimensional metric comparisons between dynamic bare footprints and insole foot impressions-forensic implications.
    Nirenberg MS; Ansert E; Krishan K; Kanchan T
    Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32111287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reproducibility of Artificial Cut on Heel Area of Rubber Outsole.
    Liu L; Wu J; Luo Y; Lin S
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jan; 65(1):229-237. PubMed ID: 31393611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation and comparison of the electrostatic dust print lifter and the electrostatic detection apparatus on the development of footwear impressions on paper.
    Craig CL; Hornsby BM; Riles M
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):819-26. PubMed ID: 16882226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Digitally processing an image of a shoe impression in blood.
    Daniel O; Levi A; Chaikovsky A; Cohen Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):1143-1147. PubMed ID: 33332705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical discrimination of footwear: a method for the comparison of accidentals on shoe outsoles inspired by facial recognition techniques.
    Petraco ND; Gambino C; Kubic TA; Olivio D; Petraco N
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 19895540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of non-contact scanning to forensic podiatry: A feasibility study.
    Crowther M; Reidy S; Walker J; Islam M; Thompson T
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33357830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality of Laypersons' Assessment of Forensically Relevant Stimuli.
    Sneyd D; Schreiber Compo N; Rivard J; Pena M; Stoiloff S; Hernandez G
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 32628285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Journey history reconstruction from the soils and sediments on footwear: An empirical approach.
    Morgan RM; Scott KR; Ainley J; Bull PA
    Sci Justice; 2019 May; 59(3):306-316. PubMed ID: 31054819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Manufacturing processes for athletic shoe outsoles and their significance in the examination of footwear impression evidence.
    Bodziak WJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jan; 31(1):153-76. PubMed ID: 3944559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Impact of Fatigue on Decision-Making in the Footwear Examination: Evidence from Questionnaires and Eye-Tracking Test.
    Yu Y; Luo Y; Xie W; Lin S; Liu L
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1991-1999. PubMed ID: 32745268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Crime scene reconstruction-Sex prediction from blood stained foot sole impressions.
    Basu N; Bandyopadhyay SK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Sep; 278():156-172. PubMed ID: 28734269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Empirical Evaluation of the Reliability of Photogrammetry Software in the Recovery of Three-Dimensional Footwear Impressions.
    Larsen HJ; Bennett MR
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Sep; 65(5):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 32407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Optimal Distance of the Electrode to the Lifting Film Surface when Lifting Dust Footwear Impressions Using an Electrostatic Dust Print Lifter.
    Xie D; Hong H; Li D; Duo S; Feng Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Nov; 64(6):1873-1877. PubMed ID: 31237978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shape measurement tools in footwear analysis: a statistical investigation of accidental characteristics over time.
    Sheets HD; Gross S; Langenburg G; Bush PJ; Bush MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):84-91. PubMed ID: 24053869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.