These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34375538)

  • 21. The Benefits and Costs of Low and High Degree of Automation.
    Tatasciore M; Bowden VK; Visser TAW; Michailovs SIC; Loft S
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):874-896. PubMed ID: 31424968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: delegation interfaces for supervisory control.
    Miller CA; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 17315844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimizing the balance between task automation and human manual control in simulated submarine track management.
    Chen SI; Visser TAW; Huf S; Loft S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):240-262. PubMed ID: 28604012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human factors assessment of conflict resolution aid reliability and time pressure in future air traffic control.
    Trapsilawati F; Qu X; Wickens CD; Chen CH
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 25600496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Impact of Transparency and Decision Risk on Human-Automation Teaming Outcomes.
    Loft S; Bhaskara A; Lock BA; Skinner M; Brooks J; Li R; Bell J
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):846-861. PubMed ID: 34340583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Factors affecting performance on a target monitoring task employing an automatic tracker.
    McFadden SM; Vimalachandran A; Blackmore E
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 14668161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of adaptive task allocation on monitoring of automated systems.
    Parasuraman R; Mouloua M; Molloy R
    Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):665-79. PubMed ID: 11536753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stages and levels of automation in support of space teleoperations.
    Li H; Wickens CD; Sarter N; Sebok A
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 25277016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can increased automation transparency mitigate the effects of time pressure on automation use?
    Tatasciore M; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Jan; 114():104142. PubMed ID: 37757606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Team performance in networked supervisory control of unmanned air vehicles: effects of automation, working memory, and communication content.
    McKendrick R; Shaw T; de Visser E; Saqer H; Kidwell B; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2014 May; 56(3):463-75. PubMed ID: 24930169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trust with increasing and decreasing reliability.
    Rittenberg BSP; Holland CW; Barnhart GE; Gaudreau SM; Neyedli HF
    Hum Factors; 2024 Dec; 66(12):2569-2589. PubMed ID: 38445652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do concurrent task demands impact the benefit of automation transparency?
    Tatasciore M; Bowden V; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jul; 110():104022. PubMed ID: 37019048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Transitioning to future air traffic management: effects of imperfect automation on controller attention and performance.
    Rovira E; Parasuraman R
    Hum Factors; 2010 Jun; 52(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 21077563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA; Lacson FC
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 16884046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Human-automation interaction for multiple robot control: the effect of varying automation assistance and individual differences on operator performance.
    Wright JL; Chen JYC; Barnes MJ
    Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 29451105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Near-Perfect Automation: Investigating Performance, Trust, and Visual Attention Allocation.
    Foroughi CK; Devlin S; Pak R; Brown NL; Sibley C; Coyne JT
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):546-561. PubMed ID: 34348511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
    Endsley MR; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Mar; 42(3):462-92. PubMed ID: 10048306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions.
    Kaber DB; Wright MC; Prinzel LJ; Clamann MP
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):730-41. PubMed ID: 16553062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Overload and automation-dependence in a multi-UAS simulation: Task demand and individual difference factors.
    Lin J; Matthews G; Wohleber RW; Funke GJ; Calhoun GL; Ruff HA; Szalma J; Chiu P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Jun; 26(2):218-235. PubMed ID: 31621357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.