These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The utility of dust for forensic intelligence: Exploring collection methods and detection limits for environmental DNA, elemental and mineralogical analyses of dust samples. Foster NR; Martin B; Hoogewerff J; Aberle MG; de Caritat P; Roffey P; Edwards R; Malik A; Thwaites P; Waycott M; Young J Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Mar; 344():111599. PubMed ID: 36801501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The bug in a teacup-monitoring arthropod-plant associations with environmental DNA from dried plant material. Krehenwinkel H; Weber S; Künzel S; Kennedy SR Biol Lett; 2022 Jun; 18(6):20220091. PubMed ID: 35702982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental DNA as an emerging tool in botanical research. Johnson MD; Freeland JR; Parducci L; Evans DM; Meyer RS; Molano-Flores B; Davis MA Am J Bot; 2023 Feb; 110(2):e16120. PubMed ID: 36632660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey. Johnson MD; Fokar M; Cox RD; Barnes MA BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 34872490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental DNA assessment of airborne plant and fungal seasonal diversity. Banchi E; Ametrano CG; Tordoni E; Stanković D; Ongaro S; Tretiach M; Pallavicini A; Muggia L; Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 738():140249. PubMed ID: 32806340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting provenance of forensic soil samples: Linking soil to ecological habitats by metabarcoding and supervised classification. Fløjgaard C; Frøslev TG; Brunbjerg AK; Bruun HH; Moeslund J; Hansen AJ; Ejrnæs R PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0202844. PubMed ID: 31283764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pilot study of eDNA metabarcoding to estimate plant biodiversity by an alpine glacier core (Adamello glacier, North Italy). Varotto C; Pindo M; Bertoni E; Casarotto C; Camin F; Girardi M; Maggi V; Cristofori A Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1208. PubMed ID: 33441696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness assessment of using riverine water eDNA to simultaneously monitor the riverine and riparian biodiversity information. Yang H; Du H; Qi H; Yu L; Hou X; Zhang H; Li J; Wu J; Wang C; Zhou Q; Wei Q Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):24241. PubMed ID: 34930992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Metabarcoding airborne pollen from subtropical and temperate eastern Australia over multiple years reveals pollen aerobiome diversity and complexity. Campbell BC; Van Haeften S; Massel K; Milic A; Al Kouba J; Addison-Smith B; Gilding EK; Beggs PJ; Davies JM Sci Total Environ; 2023 Mar; 862():160585. PubMed ID: 36502990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation. Alsos IG; Lammers Y; Yoccoz NG; Jørgensen T; Sjögren P; Gielly L; Edwards ME PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195403. PubMed ID: 29664954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unveiling biogeographical patterns of the ichthyofauna in the Tuichi basin, a biodiversity hotspot in the Bolivian Amazon, using environmental DNA. Mariac C; Duponchelle F; Miranda G; Ramallo C; Wallace R; Tarifa G; Garcia-Davila C; Ortega H; Pinto J; Renno JF PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262357. PubMed ID: 34982802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community. Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods. Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring. Lynggaard C; Bertelsen MF; Jensen CV; Johnson MS; Frøslev TG; Olsen MT; Bohmann K Curr Biol; 2022 Feb; 32(3):701-707.e5. PubMed ID: 34995490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aircraft surveys for air eDNA: probing biodiversity in the sky. Métris KL; Métris J PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15171. PubMed ID: 37077310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spider webs as eDNA samplers: Biodiversity assessment across the tree of life. Gregorič M; Kutnjak D; Bačnik K; Gostinčar C; Pecman A; Ravnikar M; Kuntner M Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2534-2545. PubMed ID: 35510791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plant biodiversity assessment through pollen DNA metabarcoding in Natura 2000 habitats (Italian Alps). Leontidou K; Vokou D; Sandionigi A; Bruno A; Lazarina M; De Groeve J; Li M; Varotto C; Girardi M; Casiraghi M; Cristofori A Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18226. PubMed ID: 34521917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]