BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34378104)

  • 1. Ineffective esophageal motility in Chicago Classification version 4.0 better predicts abnormal acid exposure.
    Zhuang QJ; Tan ND; Zhang MY; Chen SF; Luo Y; Xiao YL
    Esophagus; 2022 Jan; 19(1):197-203. PubMed ID: 34378104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0: Diagnostic changes and clinical implications.
    Sallette M; Lenz J; Mion F; Roman S
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Jan; 35(1):e14467. PubMed ID: 36314395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ineffective esophageal motility: clinical, manometric, and outcome characteristics in patients with and without abnormal esophageal acid exposure.
    Shetler KP; Bikhtii S; Triadafilopoulos G
    Dis Esophagus; 2017 Jun; 30(6):1-8. PubMed ID: 28475749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Compared to Chicago Classification Version 3.0.
    Kurin M; Adil SA; Damjanovska S; Tanner S; Greer K
    J Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Jan; 29(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 36606435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ineffective esophageal motility: The impact of change of criteria in Chicago Classification version 4.0 on predicting outcome after magnetic sphincter augmentation.
    Riccardi M; Eriksson SE; Tamesis S; Zheng P; Jobe BA; Ayazi S
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Sep; 35(9):e14624. PubMed ID: 37278157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Patients Diagnosed With Ineffective Esophageal Motility by the Chicago Classification Version 3.0 and Version 4.0 Criteria.
    Tuan AW; Syed N; Panganiban RP; Lee RY; Dalessio S; Pradhan S; Zhu J; Ouyang A
    Gastroenterology Res; 2023 Feb; 16(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 36895699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chicago Classification v4.0 Stratifies Acid Burden and Abnormal Impedance-pH Variables Better Than Chicago Classification v3.0 Chicago Classification v4.0 and GERD.
    Ribolsi M; Marchetti L; Savarino E; Gyawali CP; Cicala M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2024 Jan; 119(1):206-209. PubMed ID: 37655704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-Resolution Manometry Diagnosis of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated with Higher Reflux Burden.
    Reddy CA; Baker JR; Lau J; Chen JW
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Aug; 64(8):2199-2205. PubMed ID: 31041641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Esophagogastric junction and esophageal body contraction metrics on high-resolution manometry predict esophageal acid burden.
    Rengarajan A; Bolkhir A; Gor P; Wang D; Munigala S; Gyawali CP
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 May; 30(5):e13267. PubMed ID: 29266647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The relationship between ineffective esophageal motility and gastro-esophageal reflux disease].
    Kim SH; Lee JS; Im HH; Hwang KR; Jung IS; Hong SJ; Ryu CB; Kim JO; Jo JY; Lee MS; Shim CS; Kim BS
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2005 Oct; 46(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16247268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of extending the protocol for high resolution manometry according to the version 4.0 of the Chicago criteria. A multicenter study.
    Alcalá-González LG; Ezquerra-Duran A; Aguilar A; Barber C; Barba E; Araujo IK; Marin I; Naves J; Serra J
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2023 Mar; 35(3):e14503. PubMed ID: 36443930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are the Chicago 3.0 manometric diagnostics consistent with Chicago 4.0?
    Tobón A; Hani AC; Pulgarin CD; Ardila AF; Muñoz OM; Sierra JA; Cisternas D
    Dis Esophagus; 2024 Apr; 37(4):. PubMed ID: 38117958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical characteristics of absent contractility and ineffective esophageal motility: a multicenter study in Japan.
    Ikebuchi Y; Sato H; Ikeda H; Abe H; Ominami M; Shiota J; Sato C; Fukuda H; Ogawa R; Tatsuta T; Yokomichi H; Isomoto H; Inoue H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Nov; 38(11):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 37391859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Improves Stratification of Ineffective Esophageal Motility Patients into Clinically Meaningful Subtypes: A Two-Center International Study.
    Carmel M; Cohen DL; Hijazi B; Azzam N; Khoury T; Pagliaro M; Pesce M; Mari A
    Dysphagia; 2024 Jun; 39(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 37934251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ineffective esophageal motility phenotypes following fundoplication in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Mello MD; Shriver AR; Li Y; Patel A; Gyawali CP
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Feb; 28(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 26575034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ineffective esophageal motility in gastroesophageal erosive reflux disease and in nonerosive reflux disease: are they different?
    Lemme EM; Abrahão-Junior LJ; Manhães Y; Shechter R; Carvalho BB; Alvariz A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Mar; 39(3):224-7. PubMed ID: 15718864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients with ineffective esophageal motility benefit from laparoscopic antireflux surgery.
    Addo A; George P; Zahiri HR; Park A
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Aug; 35(8):4459-4468. PubMed ID: 32959180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association of esophageal motility disorder symptoms with Chicago classification versions 3.0 and 4.0 using high-resolution esophageal manometry: A single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.
    Alzahrani MA; Alfahadi MA; Alshehri MA; Alamri AH; Almahjani EA; Alahmari AM; Al-Shahrani AA; Alshahrani AS; Almanjahi IM; Alqarni AM
    Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2024 Mar; 30(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 37602637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of reflux and gastric electrical activity in gastroesophageal reflux disease with ineffective esophageal motility.
    Chen RR; Chen QZ; Feng BC; Wang MF; Lin L; Ye BX; Jiang LQ
    J Dig Dis; 2023 Jan; 24(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 36908189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effect of Ineffective Esophageal Motility on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
    Kasamatsu S; Matsumura T; Ohta Y; Hamanaka S; Ishigami H; Taida T; Okimoto K; Saito K; Maruoka D; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Fujie M; Kikuchi A; Arai M
    Digestion; 2017; 95(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 28343226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.