327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34379125)
21. Nationwide expansion of a financial incentive program on fruit and vegetable purchases among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
An R
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 147():80-8. PubMed ID: 26547363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nutritional quality of retail food purchases is not associated with participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for nutrition-oriented households.
Chen Y; Lin BH; Mancino L; Ver Ploeg M; Zhen C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0240263. PubMed ID: 33338058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Qualitative Study on Participant Perceptions of a Supermarket Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program.
Riemer S; Walkinshaw LP; Auvinen A; Marcinkevage J; Daniel M; Jones-Smith JC
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2021 Aug; 121(8):1497-1506. PubMed ID: 33309590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and racial/ethnic disparities in food and beverage purchases.
Grummon AH; Taillie LS
Public Health Nutr; 2018 Dec; 21(18):3377-3385. PubMed ID: 30305190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fruit and Vegetable, Fat, and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among Low-Income Mothers Living in Neighborhoods With Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education.
Molitor F; Sugerman SB; Sciortino S
J Nutr Educ Behav; 2016; 48(10):683-690.e1. PubMed ID: 27527908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost Effectiveness of Subsidizing Fruit and Vegetable Purchases Through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
Choi SE; Seligman H; Basu S
Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):e147-e155. PubMed ID: 28153648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of Inclusion of Food Purchase Restrictions and Incentives in a Food Benefit Program on Diet Quality and Food Purchasing: Results From a Randomized Trial.
Harnack LJ; Oakes JM; Elbel B; Rydell SA; Lasswell TA; Mitchell NR; Valluri S; French SA
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2024 May; 124(5):569-582.e3. PubMed ID: 38052304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of financial incentives on SNAP transactions at mobile produce markets.
Rummo PE; Lyerly R; Rose J; Malyuta Y; Cohen ED; Nunn A
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Feb; 18(1):26. PubMed ID: 33557852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Foods and Beverages Available at SNAP-Authorized Drugstores in Sections of North Carolina.
Racine EF; Kennedy A; Batada A; Story M
J Nutr Educ Behav; 2017 Sep; 49(8):674-683.e1. PubMed ID: 28889856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incentivizing fruit and vegetable purchases among participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
Andreyeva T; Luedicke J
Public Health Nutr; 2015 Jan; 18(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 24809502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Farmers' market shopping and dietary behaviours among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants.
Jilcott Pitts SB; Wu Q; Demarest CL; Dixon CE; Dortche CJ; Bullock SL; McGuirt J; Ward R; Ammerman AS
Public Health Nutr; 2015 Sep; 18(13):2407-14. PubMed ID: 25895894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transactions at a Northeastern Supermarket Chain: Differences by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use.
Franckle RL; Moran A; Hou T; Blue D; Greene J; Thorndike AN; Polacsek M; Rimm EB
Am J Prev Med; 2017 Oct; 53(4):e131-e138. PubMed ID: 28818413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.
Andreyeva T; Luedicke J; Henderson KE; Tripp AS
Am J Prev Med; 2012 Oct; 43(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 22992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differences in Food-at-Home Spending for SNAP and Non-SNAP Households Given Geographic Price Variation.
Ismail MS; Ver Ploeg M; Chomitz VR; Wilde P
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Jul; 120(7):1142-1150.e12. PubMed ID: 32220616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differences in a Chain Supermarket's Sales to SNAP Shoppers Before and Since the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Lo AE; Duffy EW; Ng SW
J Nutr Educ Behav; 2023 May; 55(5):343-353. PubMed ID: 37164550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diet Quality Over the Monthly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Cycle.
Whiteman ED; Chrisinger BW; Hillier A
Am J Prev Med; 2018 Aug; 55(2):205-212. PubMed ID: 29935945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Association between store food environment and customer purchases in small grocery stores, gas-marts, pharmacies and dollar stores.
Caspi CE; Lenk K; Pelletier JE; Barnes TL; Harnack L; Erickson DJ; Laska MN
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Jun; 14(1):76. PubMed ID: 28583131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A four-year observational study to examine the dietary impact of the North Carolina Healthy Food Small Retailer Program, 2017-2020.
Jilcott Pitts SB; Wu Q; Truesdale KP; Rafferty AP; Haynes-Maslow L; Boys KA; McGuirt JT; Fleischhacker S; Johnson N; Kaur AP; Bell RA; Ammerman AS; Laska MN
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2021 Mar; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 33761952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Buying health: assessing the impact of a consumer-side vegetable subsidy on purchasing, consumption and waste.
Smith-Drelich N
Public Health Nutr; 2016 Feb; 19(3):520-9. PubMed ID: 26054549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Incentivizing Fruit and Vegetable Purchasers at Fresh Markets in Lower 9th Ward, New Orleans.
Ferdinand R; Torres R; Scott J; Saeed I; Scribner R
Ethn Dis; 2017; 27(Suppl 1):287-294. PubMed ID: 29158653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
