146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34380711)
1. Role of locoregional surgery in treating FIGO 2009 stage IVB cervical cancer patients: a population-based study.
Wang Y; Ouyang Y; Su J; Bai Z; Cai Q; Cao X
BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e042364. PubMed ID: 34380711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiotherapy Improves the Survival of Patients With Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of SEER Database.
Huang K; Jia M; Li P; Han J; Zhang R; Li Q; Qiao Y; Xu T; Ruan P; Song Q; Li Y; Fu Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1360-1368. PubMed ID: 30036221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.
Li H; Pang Y; Cheng X
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e8. PubMed ID: 31788998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of different metastatic sites for patients with FIGO stage IVB endometrial cancer after surgery: A SEER database analysis.
Li H; Zhang R; Chen C; Wu C; Lin H; Li J; Lin Z
J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 122(5):941-948. PubMed ID: 32682330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is salvage radiotherapy optimal to patients with occult cervical cancer undergoing inadvertent simple hysterectomy? A propensity score-matched analysis of a nationwide clinical oncology database.
Wang Y; Ouyang Y; Su J; Xiao L; Bai Z; Cai Q; Cao X
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2021 Apr; 51(4):630-638. PubMed ID: 33395486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Definitive Chemoradiation for FIGO Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.
Tomita N; Mizuno M; Makita C; Kondo S; Mori M; Sakata J; Tsubouchi H; Hirata K; Tachibana H; Kodaira T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Oct; 28(8):1576-1583. PubMed ID: 30095702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The local treatment modalities in FIGO stage I-II small-cell carcinoma of the cervix are determined by disease stage and lymph node status.
Zhou J; Yang HY; Wu SG; He ZY; Lin HX; Sun JY; Li Q; Guo ZW
Cancer Med; 2016 Jun; 5(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26990881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of prognostic variables, development of predictive models, and stratification of risk groups in surgically treated FIGO early-stage (IA-IIA) carcinoma cervix.
Singh P; Tripcony L; Nicklin J
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21997176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local treatment improves survival in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer.
Xu JY; Chen JN; Lei J; Hu M; Wu SG; Zhou J
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jun; 165(3):538-545. PubMed ID: 35490033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metastatic extent-specific prognosis of women with stage IVB cervical cancer: multiple versus single distant organ involvement.
Joh S; Violette CJ; Khetan VU; Tavakoli A; Jooya ND; Cahoon SS; Klar M; Roman LD; Matsuo K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Feb; 307(2):533-540. PubMed ID: 35596748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of pre-therapy extraperitoneal surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Odunsi KO; Lele S; Ghamande S; Seago P; Driscoll DL
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 11766731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic factors and treatment comparison in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix based on population analyses.
Lin LM; Lin Q; Liu J; Chu KX; Huang YX; Zhang ZK; Li T; Dai YQ; Li JL
Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(18):6524-6532. PubMed ID: 32705800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Locoregional surgical treatment improves the prognosis in primary metastatic breast cancer patients with a single distant metastasis except for brain metastasis.
Li X; Huang R; Ma L; Liu S; Zong X
Breast; 2019 Jun; 45():104-112. PubMed ID: 30928762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of Survival in Patients With FIGO Stage IVB Cervical Cancer.
Sasano T; Mabuchi S; Kuroda H; Takahashi R; Kozasa K; Isohashi F; Yoshioka Y; Ogawa K; Kimura T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):528-33. PubMed ID: 26825839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of local treatment modalities for FIGO stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis based on SEER database.
Song X; Han Y; Shao Y; Gu W; Pei H; Jiang J
Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3175. PubMed ID: 28600535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.
Quinn BA; Deng X; Colton A; Bandyopadhyay D; Carter JS; Fields EC
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 30361045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
