These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34383545)

  • 1. The asymmetric mixed-category advantage in visual working memory: An attentional, not perceptual (face-specific) account.
    Avital-Cohen R; Gronau N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jun; 47(6):852-868. PubMed ID: 34383545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remembering faces and scenes: The mixed-category advantage in visual working memory.
    Jiang YV; Remington RW; Asaad A; Lee HJ; Mikkalson TC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1399-411. PubMed ID: 27123683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual working memory capacity for objects from different categories: a face-specific maintenance effect.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS; Thompson JC
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):719-31. PubMed ID: 18675409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of perceptual similarities in determining the asymmetric mixed-category advantage.
    Peled R; Luria R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Feb; 50(2):139-151. PubMed ID: 38376932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Encoding of faces and objects into visual working memory: an event-related brain potential study.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):735-40. PubMed ID: 23921593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.
    Calvo MG; Nummenmaa L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):471-94. PubMed ID: 18729711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces.
    Gonzalez-Garrido AA; Ramos-Loyo J; Gomez-Velazquez FR; Alvelais Alarcón M; Moises de la Serna Tuya J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 17555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.
    Lee HJ; Cho YS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1231-1243. PubMed ID: 30977105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Representational Dissimilarity of Faces and Places during a Working Memory Task is Associated with Subsequent Recognition Memory during Development.
    Skalaban LJ; Chan I; Rapuano KM; Lin Q; Conley MI; Watts RR; Busch EL; Murty VP; Casey BJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Mar; 36(3):415-434. PubMed ID: 38060253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional modulation of early ERP components in response to faces: evidence from the attentional blink paradigm.
    Darque A; Del Zotto M; Khateb A; Pegna AJ
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Apr; 25(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 21858700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid Attentional Selection of Non-native Stimuli despite Perceptual Narrowing.
    Wu R; Nako R; Band J; Pizzuto J; Ghoreishi Y; Scerif G; Aslin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2299-307. PubMed ID: 26244720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotion based attentional priority for storage in visual short-term memory.
    Simione L; Calabrese L; Marucci FS; Belardinelli MO; Raffone A; Maratos FA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e95261. PubMed ID: 24788385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional capture and hold: the oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces.
    Weaver MD; Lauwereyns J
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jan; 75(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 20455083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating affective and perceptual effects of schematic faces on attentional scope.
    Booy RM; Maslany AJ; Thompson KM; Spalek TM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Jun; 77(2):145-161. PubMed ID: 36729488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual search for schematic emotional faces risks perceptual confound.
    Mak-Fan KM; Thompson WF; Green RE
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jun; 25(4):573-84. PubMed ID: 21547761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual working memory representations guide the detection of emotional faces: An ERP study.
    Fan L; Ding C; Guo R; Xu M; Diao L; Yang D
    Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():1-8. PubMed ID: 26731647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective interference on the holistic processing of faces in working memory.
    Cheung OS; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):448-61. PubMed ID: 20364929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.
    Neumann MF; End A; Luttmann S; Schweinberger SR; Wiese H
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 15(1):180-94. PubMed ID: 24934133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Configural representations in spatial working memory: modulation by perceptual segregation and voluntary attention.
    Gmeindl L; Nelson JK; Wiggin T; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2130-42. PubMed ID: 21761373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.